My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/12/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
02/12/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 12:54:57 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:55:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
02/12/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
138
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004MX.tif
SmeadsoftID
14203
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Consistent with the attached Scope of Services, the consultants are also authorized to explore a <br /> number of fee reduction alternatives. Among the alternatives to be considered by the consultants are <br /> alternatives contained in the County's 2012 Impact Fee Review Report including: <br /> • Subsidizing Impact Fees for Non-Residential Land Uses Only <br /> • Updating Traffic Impact Fee Variables <br /> • Consolidating Land Use Categories <br /> Finally,the consultants are authorized to explore any other alternative that could lead to a reduced <br /> fee. <br /> It should be noted that proposed fee reduction alternatives may not be mutually exclusive. For <br /> example,the County could update impact fee variables and consolidate land use categories. In fact, <br /> the County has both updated variables and consolidated land use categories in the past. Therefore,it <br /> is possible that the consultants may include several alternatives which may be implemented in <br /> combination with one another to achieve the BCC's stated goal of a reduction in non-residential fees. <br /> It is anticipated that the total cost of the study will be approximately$150,000. In this case,there are <br /> sufficient funds in the impact fee administration account to cover that cost. Consequently, the <br /> impact fee update study can be paid for without using any taxpayer funds. <br /> FUNDING <br /> The cost of the study will be paid for out of the impact fee administration account. There are no <br /> impacts to the General Fund or any other funding source from this item. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the BCC consider the attached Scope of Services, make any necessary <br /> changes,approve the Scope,and authorize staff to issue a Request for Proposals to obtain consultant <br /> services to develop an impact fee update. <br /> Attachment: 1. Impact Fee Scope of Services <br /> APPROVED AGENDA ITEM• Indian River Co, Appro ed Date <br /> • Admin. <br /> FOR• /01 �0/ Legal a•G • I3 <br /> Budget /j <br /> BY- <br /> Dept. <br /> Risk Mgr. <br /> ... <br /> F:\Community Development\UsersWPO\Meetings\BCC\2013\lmpact Fees 021213 BCC.doc 3 <br /> 104 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.