My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/12/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
02/12/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 12:54:57 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:55:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
02/12/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
138
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004MX.tif
SmeadsoftID
14203
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
year waiver would provide an incentive of about $6,500, while a three-year waiver would equal <br /> almost $4,000. Franchise fees are now the single largest revenue source for the M.S.T.U. Fund. <br /> In the current year, franchise fee revenues are estimated to provide $8.5 million in funding. The <br /> second largest source, property taxes accounts for $7.5 million. Any significant impact on this <br /> .. revenue source needs to be seriously considered prior to moving forward with a change. <br /> SUMMARY <br /> Staff has some concerns regarding the financial impact of these incentives on the County. These <br /> incentives would result in lost revenues or requirements to subsidize fees in an amount that is <br /> difficult to predict. Many of the funding sources for these subsidies are General Fund and/or <br /> M.S.T.U. Fund dollars. The County has remained on solid financial footing throughout this <br /> economic downturn. However, fund balances could be strained for some time to come due to <br /> reduced revenues moving forward while the county may face rising costs. The efficacy and cost <br /> of each incentive needs to be considered prior to moving forward with additional incentives. <br /> Some of these incentives could be implemented at a relatively small cost to the county. <br /> However, others may be relatively significant depending upon the implementation of such <br /> incentives. Also, the County needs to look at the combined impact of such incentives in the <br /> event that multiple incentives are approved. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the board of Commissioners review this financial analysis and provide <br /> ,,.. direction to staff regarding further considerations and/or implementation of additional incentives. <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> Financial Analysis of the Impact of New Incentives on Three Job Grant Applicants <br /> Indian River Coun A ved Date <br /> APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Administrator <br /> Legal '7 <br /> BY: Budget <br /> . Baird De artment <br /> Ooseph <br /> ounty Administrator Risk Management <br /> FOR: February 12 2013 <br /> 120 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.