My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/05/2013 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
03/05/2013 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 1:19:35 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:55:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
03/05/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
266
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004N0.tif
SmeadsoftID
14205
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recommendations for Increased Accessibility& Efficiency in Florida Elections <br /> Florida Department of State <br /> commissions have the responsibility to provide the appropriate support to meet these needs. <br /> Overall, supervisors of elections were very successful in the administration of the 2012 General <br /> Election. However, some counties failed to prepare effectively and it reflected poorly on the <br /> entire state. <br /> The use of outdated voting equipment created issues during the 2012 General Election. Upgraded <br /> equipment could have prevented issues in some counties such as memory card failures. <br /> Additionally, some Florida counties continue to operate without utilizing technological advances, <br /> such as electronic poll books, which can shorten the time it takes to do voter intake and minimize <br /> the possibility of dual voting fraud. <br /> In addition to technological shortcomings in some counties, supervisors of elections who delayed <br /> the realignment of precincts until after the election required some voters in the same precinct to <br /> have different ballot styles, which created additional time consuming quality assurance steps, <br /> which further impacted the voting time for voters in large precincts and those with the heaviest <br /> turnout. Delays at the polling place were also caused by supervisors of elections who used fixed <br /> formulas to distribute vote scanners to precincts based on the number of registered voters rather <br /> than based on turnout. <br /> Priority Recommendations <br /> 1. Extend the Early Voting Schedule <br /> �.r. Amend § 101.657(l)(d), Fla. Stat., to require supervisors of elections to offer at least eight <br /> consecutive days of early voting with the flexibility to extend up to 14 consecutive days of early <br /> voting, ending on either the Saturday or Sunday immediately prior to Election Day. <br /> Current Law: <br /> Early voting begins on the 10th day before an election and ends on the 3rd day(Saturday) before <br /> the election. <br /> 2. Expand the Definition of an Early Voting Site <br /> Amend § 101.657(1)(a), Fla. Stat., to expand the allowable locations of early voting sites at <br /> government owned, managed or occupied facilities to include the main or branch office of a <br /> supervisor of elections, a city hall, courthouse, county commission building, public library, civic <br /> center, convention center, fairgrounds or stadium, which will benefit voters by increasing the <br /> size of early voting locations and improve their indoor occupancy and outdoor parking <br /> availability. <br /> Current Law: <br /> Early voting locations are limited to the main or branch office of the supervisor. However, for a <br /> branch office to be used for early voting, it must be a permanent facility of the supervisor and <br /> .,, been designated and used as such for at least one year prior to the election. The supervisor may <br /> Q3- F - 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.