My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/09/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
04/09/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 1:29:12 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:56:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/09/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
172
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004N4.tif
SmeadsoftID
14209
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Paladin summarized if this came to fruition he foresaw a service retail <br /> center to service the area and would share plans with the community before <br /> anything was decided. <br /> Chairman Zimmerman closed the public hearing at 9:33 p.m. <br /> Mr. Hamner thought the situation with the widening of CR #510 needed to <br /> be straightened out before any redevelopment could happen in this area of the <br /> County. <br /> Mr. Keating advised there was no impact fee money left and the CR #510 <br /> project was still in years four and five of Capital Improvements Element. <br /> Mr. Brognano did not see any reason why this proposal should not be <br /> seriously considered because there would be a minimum of a 100 foot easement <br /> between the project and the community behind it, and he felt it mirrored a mixed- <br /> use project. <br /> Mr. Keating pointed out there had never been an extension of a node that <br /> was non-contiguous and this was the creation of a new node. He explained <br /> Liberty Park was not a node that could be expanded on and the applicant needed <br /> to change Policy 1.25 of the Comp Plan if he wanted to do this project. Mr. <br /> Keating stated if Mr. Paladin had applied for a text amendment to the Comp Plan <br /> when he had originally talked about this with staff, he would be well on his way. <br /> He noted a specific policy change could be made for the Wabasso Corridor, and <br /> felt this may very well pass in light of today's economy. <br /> Discussion ensued. <br /> 18:02:53 <br /> ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano to approve the <br /> applicant's proposed land use amendment and <br /> rezoning request. <br /> The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> Mr. Emmons opined if this was approved it would be an arbitrary decision <br /> and while he wished the applicant success, the reality was the County needed <br /> rules. He felt modification of Policy 1.25 would be the best course in this <br /> situation. <br /> PZC/Approved 7 October 25, 2012 <br /> F:\BCC\All Committees\P&Z\2012—AGENDAS & MINUTES\P&Z-10-25-12.doc <br /> 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.