Laserfiche WebLink
In this case,the subject property is part of the US# 1,49h Street to 3 8Th Lane,Commercial/Industrial <br /> node. According to the County's Commercial/Industrial node data book,this node is approximately <br /> 59%developed. Even though this node is not 70%developed,the subject request meets Policy 1.24 <br /> because the request involves a swap of land use designations. <br /> Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 <br /> Another important policy to consider in plan amendment requests is Future Land Use Element Policy <br /> 14.3. That policy requires that one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment <br /> request. Those criteria are: <br /> 1. The proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan; <br /> 2. The proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; <br /> 3. The proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances <br /> affecting the subject property; or <br /> 4. The proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at <br /> separate sites and,that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density <br /> or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. <br /> In this case,the proposed land use amendment meets Policy14.3's fourth criterion. Therefore the <br /> , <br /> proposed amendment is consistent with Policy 14.3. <br /> Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 <br /> Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into the <br /> urban service area through zoning and the LDRs. Since the proposed small scale land use <br /> amendment and rezoning would allow and encourage more development on the subject property and <br /> the subject property is within the urban service area, the request implements Future Land Use <br /> Element Policy 2.2. <br /> Summary of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan <br /> While the referenced policies are particularly applicable to this request,other Comprehensive Plan <br /> policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for <br /> consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis,staff determined that the <br /> request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 6 <br /> 146 <br />