Laserfiche WebLink
Existing and Proposed Zoning Criteria Analyzed <br /> Maps <br /> ►Concurrency <br /> Po-Consistency with the Comprehensive <br /> PIS? <br /> x. N <br /> 1 Enivi nmental impact <br /> �. <br /> ►Compatibility with surrounding uses <br /> Concurrency Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br /> Consistent with the Comprehensive <br /> ►Swap of land use designations plan Goals, objectives, and Policies <br /> ►Not increasing density or intensity and Future Land Use Map <br /> ►Exempt from concurrency review <br /> AA deNailbd concurrency review will be done at <br /> the time of project development rn <br /> FLUE Policy 14.3 Compatibility <br /> Requires that one of four criteria be met to <br /> approve a comp plan amendment. ►IL to the east <br /> ► RM-10 to the north, <br /> vacant , <br /> ►A mistake in the approved plan; ► RM-10 to the west of <br /> tsouthern property, <br /> „Rr��u�pversight in the approved plan; ,i;��sc��l, <br /> �srsluntial change in circumstances;or > 1 1(J t4:the west of <br /> g horth�rn"property, <br /> -or reconfiguration of land uses at wn by-applicant <br /> rate siteso incompatibilities are <br /> ` cied <br /> i gg1I t is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan <br /> /60 d " 2 <br />