07/02/2013 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(W ON MOTION BY Dr. Day, SECONDED BY Mr. Rednour, to accept staff's recommendation with the modification of putting L-1, L-2, M-1 and M-2 together and using 30% as the base minimum. UNDER DISCUSSION Vice-Chairman Hamner related he personally felt there should be a bigger proportion allowed on projects with more acreage. He inquired if the motion meant the owner of a 30-acre parcel would be allowed nine acres if 30% was allowed, or would he only be able to develop three acres of the nine acres. Mr. Keating clarified only three acres would be allowed until some residential was put in, because staff felt that was the meaning of mixed use. Vice-Chairman Hamner suggested if we had the 30% three acre minimum, could we not say "or up to 50% of the designated amount" at the same time, which would cover both small and large parcels and mean in the case of nine acres, a person could go to 4.5 acres. Mr. Keating recommended staying with the three acres as proposed by staff. Mr. Brognano proposed adding "or 50% of the designated amount" to Dr. Day's motion. Attorney DeBraal noted there was a motion on the floor and both Dr. Day and Mr. Rednour would have to accept the amendment to the motion. Discussion ensued. ON AMENDED MOTION BY Dr. Day, AMENDED SECOND BY Mr. Rednour, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to accept staffs recommendation to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed comprehensive plan text amendment for transmittal to state and regional reviewing agencies with the modification of putting L-1, L-2, M-1 and M-2 together and using 30% as the base minimum; and allowing three acres or 50% of the total commercial acreage allowed, which is limited to 30% of the total project; whichever is greater. (W PZC/Approved 5 March 14,2013 F:\BCC\AII Committees\P&Z\2013—AGENDAS& MINUTES\P&Z-03-14-13.doc ATTACHMENT 1 1 1 O