My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/20/2013AP-B
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
08/20/2013AP-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 2:27:24 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:00:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Agenda Packet B
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
08/20/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
393
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000F\S0004NK.tif
SmeadsoftID
14225
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Currently, there are no intervening buildings between the CVS facility and the Park of Commerce <br /> kow perimeters. There is, however, one significant landscape buffer provided(98th Avenue perimeter). <br /> Even with its 68 foot height, the CVS facility is not visible from I-95. Although the building is visible <br /> from SR60, the large park site context and the significant setback from SR60 adequately mitigates the <br /> mass and scale of the building's appearance from SR60. When the Park of Commerce provides its <br /> required SR60 buffer and/or intervening facilities are located between the CVS building and SR60, the <br /> CVS building will completely blend into the industrial park setting. Currently, the view of the CVS <br /> building from 98th Avenue demonstrates the significant positive visual impact of the special Type "C" <br /> buffer planting along the CVS site's 98th Avenue frontage. Depending upon one's vantage point from 98th <br /> Avenue, that buffer effectively screens the CVS building partially or completely. Thus, the existing <br /> perimeter buffer requirement,which mandates taller than normal plant sizes at the time of installation(e.g. <br /> 16' canopy trees vs. 12' canopy trees),has proven effective in visually screening the taller building at the <br /> project perimeter. Staff's conclusion is that effective perimeter buffering can have a more positive visual <br /> impact than a simple setback, and that some of the existing special setbacks can be reduced where an <br /> effective perimeter buffer is required. <br /> i Proposed Ordinance . <br /> As structured, the proposed ordinance retains many of the existing west county industrial park height <br /> exception requirements. Consistent with the existing height exception, the proposed ordinance will <br /> continue to apply only to buildings within 100+acre industrial parks/subdivisions located west of I-95,and <br /> will continue to require a 2,000 foot setback from I-95 and a 200 foot setback from 98th Avenue. While <br /> the proposed ordinance retains various provisions in the current height exception, it reduces the SR60 <br /> (W setback from 1,000 feet to 500 feet,but adds a requirement that a special perimeter buffer or intervening <br /> building be located between the tall building and SR60 and/or 98th Avenue. In addition, the proposed <br /> ordinance requires a graduated special setback for tall buildings that increases by 4 feet (horizontal) for <br /> every 1 foot(vertical)over the normal height limitation. Under the new regulation,a 68 foot tall building <br /> such as CVS would have a special setback from a non-SR60/non-98th Avenue perimeter of 157 feet [25' <br /> normal setback+(68'—35')x 4],while an 80 foot tall building would have a 205 foot special setback. In <br /> staff's opinion,the proposed graduated setback requirement will more fairly treat proposed buildings based <br /> on the building's actual height and profile,while providing for ample and proportional setbacks. Finally, <br /> the proposed ordinance will delete a height exception sunset provision that is no longer in effect. <br /> Under the proposed ordinance, staff estimates that up to 2 more facilities similar in size and height to the <br /> CVS facility could be located within the middle third of the Indian River Park of Commerce. In addition,a <br /> potential large and tall building site could be assembled and developed at the southeast corner of 98th <br /> Avenue and SR60, and potential development envelopes for tall buildings would be expanded on the <br /> industrially designated properties that lie north and west of the Park of Commerce. Consequently, staff <br /> believes that the proposed ordinance will provide for more ready to build and future development sites for <br /> tall industrial buildings, while ensuring adequate aesthetic protections for the community. <br /> • Economic and Affordable Housing Development Impacts <br /> The proposed amendment will increase options for siting tall industrial buildings and will not change the <br /> cost of development. Therefore,the proposed ordinance is neutral with respect to the cost of development <br /> and impacts on development of affordable housing. With respect to economic development,the proposed <br /> ordinance is positive since it will increase the number of potential sites for industrial buildings that house <br /> target industries promoted by county economic development policies. <br /> FACommunity Deve1opment\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\WCIPheightexception.doc 4517 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.