My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/28/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
5/28/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:22:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/28/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s � � <br />County Clerk Jeffrey Barton introduced Ms. Christine Hill <br />and Mr. Dan O'Keefe of Coopers and Lybrand. <br />Dan O'Keefe, Audit Manager, came before the Board to review <br />their report. Mr. O'Keefe referred to their report on Page 1, <br />stressing that this is an unqualified opinion. He then went <br />systematically through the report, mentioning first the Combined <br />Balance Sheet on Pages 4 and 5, which shows all your governmental <br />fund types and proprietary fund types. He noted that the General <br />Fund has an unreserved fund balance of $15,597,331. <br />On Pages 8 and 9 is a Combined Statement of Revenues, <br />Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances, and Mr. O'Keefe <br />explained that this is a budgetary comparison of your governmen- <br />tal fund types, which shows you how your actual expenditures went <br />against your budgeted operations. As you can see, your revenues <br />exceeded your original budget estimates and your expenditures <br />were under the original estimate, which resulted in an excess of <br />revenues over expenditures by about two million. This added to <br />your fund balance at the end of the year and put the General Fund <br />in a fairly strong position Mr. O'Keefe felt that the amount of <br />fund balance in the General Fund is fairly conservative and a <br />good amount. <br />If you look at your Special Revenue Funds, which is a <br />combination of a lot of different things and includes among other <br />things grant funds which vary from year to year, you have what <br />looks to be an excess of revenues, and under expenditures, it <br />looks like you overspent your budget, which you really did not <br />because you were budgeting in excess of 11 million. What it <br />actually means is that some of the projects you originally <br />budgeted, you did not complete in this fiscal year. Mr. O'Keefe <br />noted that Page 10 addresses Capital Project Funds, and he <br />explained the way you have been budgeting these projects is that <br />while the aggregate cost of the project is budgeted, you may not <br />necessarily complete it within this fiscal year, which accounts <br />for the bulk of your favorable variance of approximately six <br />million. <br />Mr. O'Keefe moved on to Page 12, All Proprietary Fund Types, <br />explaining that the Enterprise column consists of several <br />different funds, Water and Sewer being the biggest, and it also <br />includes the Landfill as well as the Solid Waste Disposal <br />District. Another entity included within this column is the <br />Housing Authority. Under the Internal Service column, the most <br />important item there is the Self Insurance Program. Mr. O'Keefe <br />continued that looking at your Enterprise Funds, your charges for <br />services are broken out by category. Your Landfill fees are 5 <br />million dollars now, and your Water and Sewer fees also. The <br />7 f�UGK F'AuC <br />MAY 2 8 `9'91 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.