My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/28/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
5/28/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:22:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/28/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 2 8 1991 PooK 831 PAGE 46S <br />Mr. O'Keefe noted that if you look at Table 10, the Sanitary <br />Landfill, in 1990 the coverage comes out to be 4.06, which is <br />well above your required coverage. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to point out that we have 4 <br />times normal coverage there. In the Golf Course, we are solid <br />there as well. In the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, we have <br />gone from 3.63 in 1981 down to 1.69 in 1990 as the growth of that <br />system has come on. <br />Mr. O'Keefe noted that there was a lot of acquisition <br />recently of smaller systems, and getting them up to the caliber <br />of your existing system takes some time, effort and cost. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt these tables show the trend of <br />what we are doing and demonstrate the need for the rate increase. <br />Obviously that coverage is important because if you don't have <br />it, you don't issue debt. <br />Mr. O'Keefe agreed that was a good point. He did want to <br />point out the Housing Authority is moving along very well. He <br />believed they have received final approval from FHA for the final <br />phases of their Victory Park project, and their projects are <br />doing very well and covering their costs. Of course, they still <br />have a need for their overall operating costs to be subsidized by <br />the County, and he believed that is running about $70,000, but <br />the complexes themselves, which they also audit, are doing well <br />and seem to be in good shape. <br />Mr. O'Keefe next referred to the Internal Service Funds set <br />out on page 112 - Fleet Management and Self Insurance. He <br />advised that the Self Insurance Program is, in essence, the <br />County's privately owned and operated insurance company, and <br />accounting for it is treated very much the same as any insurance <br />company. The auditors have to go in and make certain the County <br />has computed their reserves properly. Mr. O'Keefe referred to <br />claims expense including "incurred but not reported claims" <br />which is an actuarial determination. He noted the important <br />thing is that your retained earnings are $539,000. In these <br />funds it is difficult to say if that is a good year or bad, but <br />the main thing is that you are matching your premiums - your <br />charges back -to your user departments - with the claims on a <br />fairly good basis. He stressed that you really have to look at <br />this on a year to year basis, but right now they can say that the <br />County has transferred enough money in and is charging your user <br />departments adequately and recovering expenses very well. <br />Mr. O'Keefe then introduced Ms. Christine Hill, a partner in <br />their office and his boss. Ms. Hill felt that Mr. O'Keefe has <br />done a good job leading the Board through the numbers, but she <br />would like to take a few minutes and talk about the nature of <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.