My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/4/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
6/4/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:24:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/04/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tracts, one acre tracts; the eastern end has larger lots and the <br />western parts has smaller lots, 70 by 120, quarter acre lots. <br />Commissioner Wheeler brought up the point of how the <br />properties are assessed, by foot or what, and that some will <br />receive more benefit than others, and John Coppola explained that <br />people under an acre are paying $15.00 per parcel and over an acre <br />it is $60.00. There was further discussion about who is paying how <br />much. <br />John Coppola stated the residents want to increase the <br />assessment from $15.00 to $50.00 per parcel acre. They want the <br />increase to take place during the County fiscal years of 10-1-91 <br />through 9-30-92 and 10-1-92 through 9-30-93 and revert back to <br />$15.00 on 10-1-93. <br />Mr. Coppola recounted the history of the ordinance and <br />demonstrated, with the aid of the enlarged map, the current parcel <br />acres in Vero Lake Estates and estimated, after penalties and <br />discounts, the MSTU brings in $58,000 per year. By paving these <br />roads in Vero Lake Estates everyone will be approximately one-half <br />mile from a paved road so for all those people who want the country <br />setting and do not want paved roads, they still can have a rural <br />setting. The paved roads will serve as main feeder roads for <br />residents and emergency services. <br />Mr. Coppola stated a County official explained at an <br />association meeting in April that after 101st Avenue is paved all <br />other roads would be done by petition paving and the MSTU money <br />should be used for the drainage that is being implemented now. <br />However, the members felt that is not what the MSTU is set up for <br />so somebody made a motion to increase the MSTU. It was passed and <br />the association members decided $50.00 would be a good fee so <br />notice was sent to the membership about a meeting to approve this <br />plan. At the meeting there was a positive outcome; there was only <br />one negative vote, but that was understandable. Mr. Coppola said <br />the residents wanted these improvements because of all the <br />construction going on in the subdivision and they feel, with the <br />high school, there will be an influx of people and traffic, which <br />will result in road deterioration. Some of the residents feel that <br />by paving the roads they will save wear and tear on their vehicles <br />and, of course, the paved roads will not have to be graded by the <br />County. The association members felt they did not want the $2.00 <br />per front footage cost because $189,000 should make enough money to <br />pave the roads. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked what percentage the County will <br />pay, and Director Davis explained the formula. <br />11 <br />BOCK <br />9uat U <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.