Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />JUN 4 A991 <br />Boor yI? <br />' Irl JE�LiY <br />Director Pinto felt the routing of lines will change somewhat <br />along with the sizing of lines and when they should be built. <br />Director Pinto next addressed the possibility of limiting the <br />consultant's responsibility, that if he does the master plan he <br />would not be able to construct or design any of the construction <br />that he proposes in the master plan. This would give him more <br />independence and give us confidence that he is truly master <br />planning based on need and not lining up another job for himself. <br />Commissioner Eggert voiced her concern regarding affordable <br />housing and the fact that we may be forced into either designating <br />certain areas or setting up a demonstration area, and in this <br />respect the master plan may be premature. <br />Director Pinto noted we are not talking about any major zoning <br />changes. <br />Commissioner Eggert thought we could be; the details are <br />unknown and that is the whole problem. She felt by the end of this <br />year we might have a much better idea of where we might be going <br />and what we might be suggesting than we do now, and be able to get <br />an idea from the Commission what they are or are not willing to do. <br />Director Pinto felt if the timing is less than a year we <br />should start the selection process, choose the firm that you want <br />to do the project, and then set the timing for it. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt master plans are not followed <br />because each newly hired firm comes up with a new plan that differs <br />from the master plan. Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien <br />suggested the following condition be included in the agreement with <br />a master planner: "In order to remove any potential conflict of <br />interest or possible appearance of conflict of interest, the entity <br />selected for this planning project shall be ineligible to bid or <br />perform any work on subsequent projects recommended or required by <br />the completed plan. Stated another way, it is the intention of the <br />County to separate the maker of the project plan from engineers and <br />contractors who actually do the project called for in the plan; <br />therefore, the entity selected to do the design may not be the <br />entity, or participate with any entity, in any engineering or <br />construction done under the design plan. This prohibition shall <br />exist until all work is completed under the design plan or a major <br />update of the design plan is made by another entity." <br />Commissioner Eggert suggested a five-year plan because most <br />plans do not last more than five years. <br />Administrator Chandler cautioned there are pros and cons to <br />the type of approach suggested by Attorney O'Brien and it should be <br />studied very closely. In terms of a master plan itself, he agreed <br />we do not need another master plan created. He concurred with <br />18 <br />M M r <br />