My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/4/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
6/4/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:24:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 8.3 PAGE WE' <br />Unlike contracts for construction of required improvements for <br />subdivisions (eg. Copeland's Landing Subdivision), no formal <br />resolution is required of the Board to draw upon the subject letter <br />of credit. The Board needs only to approve a motion authorizing <br />staff to draw upon the existing letter of credit. Staff will draw <br />upon the.existing letter of credit. if no renewed letter of credit <br />is provided prior to the June 16th expiration date. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize <br />staff to draw upon the Sun Bank Letter of Credit on the County's <br />behalf. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously <br />authorized staff to draw upon the Sun Bank Letter of <br />Credit on the County's behalf. <br />D. Minor Amendment to Computer Programming Consultant <br />The Board reviewed memo from Community Development Director <br />Bob Keating dated May 28, 1991: <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />VA <br />FROM: Robert M. Keating, AICP K' <br />Community Development Director <br />DATE: May 28, 1991 <br />SUBJECT: MINOR AMENDMENT TO COMPUTER PROGRAMMING <br />CONSULTANT CONTRACT <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular - <br />meeting of June 4, 1991. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />On March 27, 1990, the board of county commissioners entered into <br />a contract with Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. to develop an <br />automated development review/concurrency management system. The <br />total contract cost with amendments is $68,500. <br />While the consultants have substantially completed their contracted <br />work activities and the system is currently functioning, there are <br />several additional minor activities which need to be done by the <br />consultant and involve amending the.contract. These activities <br />consist of making minor changes to the county traffic model to <br />facilitate its use with the concurrency system and making minor <br />changes to the development review software to reflect modifications <br />necessary to accommodate system inefficiencies. A copy of the <br />proposed amendment is attached to this item. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.