Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK PA,L�� <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Schopke Construction <br />as the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder meeting spec- <br />ifications for subject project. <br />---------------------------------------------------------------- <br />TO: Fran Boynton, Manager <br />Purchasing Division <br />FROM: - Terry B. Thompson, P.E.C>� <br />Capital Project Manager <br />SUBJECT: Bid No. 91-88/Treasure Shores Park <br />DATE: June 3, 1991 <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br />The Public Works Department has reviewed the bids for subject <br />project and recommends award to . the low bidder, Schopke <br />Construction and Engineering, Inc. <br />Alternate #1 in the amount of $1,195. should be added to the base <br />bid amount of #387,115 for a total contract award amount of <br />$388,310. Funding is from Account No. 311-210-572-066.51. <br />Please prepare a report for the Board's regular meeting of June <br />11, 1991. The FRDAP Grant for this project requires that <br />construction be completed by November 1, 1991. <br />Commissioner Eggert just wanted to make sure exactly what we <br />are approving as the one memo cites Alternate #1 at an additional <br />amount, and Administrator Chandler clarified that staff is <br />recommending that Alternate #1 be included in the award for a <br />total of $388,310. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, to award Bid #91-88 for <br />Treasure Shores Park Construction to Schopke Con- <br />struction as the low bidder in the total amount of <br />$388,310 including Alternate #1. <br />Commissioner Scurlock expressed concern about the fact that <br />we had problems with Schopke on the Jail construction; although, <br />he understood that they did a good job at the Library. He just <br />wished to be sure that everything is now all right. <br />Director Dean and Administrator Chandler assured him there <br />is no problem with Schopke. <br />Attorney Vitunac interjected that we are involved in a <br />lawsuit with Schopke relating to his subcontractors, Dean and <br />ECSI. They are pointing the finger at each other as to who is <br />going to pay the damages. The reason we have to sue Schopke is <br />T <br />