My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/18/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
6/18/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:29:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/18/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />BUUK <br />83 FAGS 746 <br />Commissioner Scurlock reported that the LAAC looked at this. <br />property but it did not meet their criteria, and at that meeting <br />it was suggested it might of interest to the county for something <br />else. Also at the LAAC meeting, they decided to do a referendum <br />in November of 1992, and the serious concern was that we don't <br />have any money in our current budget or proposed in next year's <br />budget to attempt to secure some of the properties on our list <br />that do meet the Comp Plan requirements and that may be under <br />threat of development. The Committee chose not to ask the County <br />Commission to put money in the budget in that they knew it was a <br />tight year. Commissioner Scurlock further noted that when he <br />looks in terms of the actual inventory we did on park land and <br />recreation, actually we exceed all standards on acreage per <br />capita, and that is where he has a real concern. It is nice to <br />have this, but how much acreage is enough, especially since we are <br />going to be faced with coming up with money for lands that bring <br />us into compliance with our Comp Plan. Although the subject <br />property is a nice piece of property, and it is adjacent to the <br />Fairgrounds, he believed this $400,000 could be better used to <br />bring us in compliance. <br />Chairman Bird noted that looking at this from his standpoint <br />as Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Committee, he believed the <br />property is valuable, but looking at it as a County Commissioner, <br />he agreed it is a matter of priorities. <br />Administrator Chandler confirmed that we just don't have the <br />money this year, and Commissioner Scurlock felt in fairness to <br />the seller, they may be better off marketing the property else- <br />where than waiting for the county. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (3-0) <br />agreed not to follow staff recommendation and not <br />to pursue either option to acquire the subject <br />property. <br />OSLO ROAD PROPERTY PURCHASE <br />Administrator Chandler made the staff presentation, as <br />follows: <br />156 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.