My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/18/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
6/18/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:29:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/18/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r 1 <br />Ci't� ��� <br />BOOK F',1GE 1164 <br />warranted. Such justification must include data and analysis that <br />show that the proposed mixed use project, given its size and <br />project population as well as the projected population of any other <br />approved mixed use project, will not increase the county's <br />residential allocation factor. <br />Mixed Use Project Criteria <br />The mixed use concept will be successful only if sufficient <br />controls are established to ensure that its objectives are met. <br />Such controls involve limiting the number and location of <br />districts, mandating more rigorous approval criteria, ensuring the <br />protection of natural resources, and setting specific project <br />design standards. Each of these issues are addressed below. <br />Location <br />The location of mixed use districts will be an important factor in <br />their viability. By restricting the location of mixed use <br />districts, the total number of districts can be limited, and the <br />interaction between project residents and outside attractors can be <br />minimized. These are important factors in creating successful <br />mixed use districts. Probably the most effective location <br />criterion is a minimum separation distance between mixed use <br />projects. This will not only .limit the potential number of <br />projects; it will also limit external project trips. <br />To establish a reasonable separation distance between mixed use <br />districts, staff assessed existing travel distances in the county. <br />In so doing, the staff found that -the average trip length for <br />residentially based trips (as used in the county traffic impact fee <br />model) was 3 miles. Recognizing that the three mile length is an <br />average distance for residential trips, staff determined that a <br />minimum separation distance between mixed use districts which is <br />double the average distance would significantly reduce inter - <br />district interaction and reduce external trips overall. A six mile <br />separation distance between mixed use districts has therefore been <br />established. With such a six mile limitation, the number of - <br />potential districts is theoretically limited to approximately <br />eight, but realistically to far fewer. <br />O Approval Criteria <br />As a floating land use designation, the mixed use district is a <br />discretionary designation. Without an entitlement to a mixed use <br />designation, applicants are subject to the discretion of the Board <br />of County Commissioners. By having such discretion, the Board can <br />impose requirements designed to produce high quality projects. Two <br />requirements would have that effect. <br />One is to require that all mixed use land use designations be <br />established by comprehensive plan amendment. With such a <br />requirement, the timing of district approvals could be controlled, <br />and the comprehensive plan data and analysis could be amended to <br />reflect population impacts of mixed use designation approvals. The <br />second requirement would be to mandate that all mixed use projects <br />be approved as Florida Quality Development Projects. With this <br />requirement, the quality of mixed use projects can be ensured. <br />Both of these requirements have been incorporated into the mixed <br />use district criteria. <br />' O Natural Resource Protection <br />While the mixed use designation will enhance natural resource and <br />agricultural preservation through its fifty percent preservation <br />requirement, .there is a need to provide even greater natural <br />resource protection. For that reason, it would be beneficial to_ <br />require that mixed use projects not adversely impact <br />74 <br />_ M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.