Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />800K 8 3 PA.�E 71 <br />always the case, time worked to our favor - the price in the <br />utilities area was starting to drop and drop drastically, and the <br />original contractor on the change order ended up with no work at <br />all and was in a position where he just wants to keep his men <br />working. All of these things fell in our favor this time, but <br />with the bids ranging all the way from $86,000 to $180,000, it is <br />hard to call what bids will come in at. In another of today's <br />agenda items, you will see that we have ended up with a 500 <br />decrease in an assessment project we did; so, it is very hard to <br />estimate. The job has been reduced and changed around as shown <br />in the following memos, but Director Pinto agreed that, in <br />essence, we are spending $100,000 less than we started out t04- <br />spend: <br />ospend: <br />DATE: JULY 1, 1991 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: TERRANCE G. PIN <br />� <br />DIRECTOR OF UTI SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: 82ND AVENUE FORCE MAIN PROJECT <br />The attached memo explains the difference between the original <br />proposed change order and the bids for the 82nd Avenue sewer line. <br />The comparison looks fair, except I believe the engineering cost <br />should be close to the same of both sides, +/- a couple thousand <br />dollars for cost of bidding. The difference is possibly closer to <br />$39,000. <br />The bids we received ranged from $86,000 to $180,000, which <br />indicates what kind of market is out there now. <br />DATE: JUNE 28, 1991 <br />TO: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />FROM: WILLIAMWAIN <br />CAPITALTS E <br />DEPARTME ITY SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: 82ND AVENUE SEWER MAIN - ORIGINAL FINAL COST COMPARISON <br />Below please find a comparison of original change order cost, .scope of <br />services, and final bid costs for the above -listed project. <br />1. Provide plans (originally we were to provide base <br />right -a -way and road. Contractor was to provide information <br />and pipe layout to generate complete construction plans; we <br />paid Kimball/Lloyd approximately $5,000.00 for the survey <br />roadway and right-of-way). This cost is not addressed in <br />either evaluation, as the cost was expended for either <br />option. In-house time and engineering expenditures are close <br />to $12,000.00, (for complete plan and specification assembly, <br />and bidding.) <br />14 <br />r <br />