Laserfiche WebLink
J U L 16 <br />BOOK 83 P,Ar E q9.f <br />staff; so, those are considered indirect expenses; they are not <br />dollars going out to outside sources; and they would not be .on a <br />ledger book. <br />Commissioner Scurlock confirmed that the only things you see <br />on the general ledger are hard costs. You would have to go to <br />the Public Works Department, Engineering, etc., to see the actual <br />hours logged out. <br />Mrs. Manning had further questions about costs and record <br />keeping, and Commissioner Scurlock asked how the transfer from <br />project accounts is done - how you book it when a department asks <br />to be compensated back for their in-house expenses. <br />Administrator Chandler advised that when the project iso' <br />ready to go to construction, they put together a formal project <br />budget where they identify all costs; in the interim the in-house <br />or in-kind costs are maintained, and all this is shown in that <br />total budget. <br />Mrs. Manning asked if Mr. Davis remembered stating it would <br />cost anywhere from $120,000 to $160,000 to complete Vero Lake <br />Estates, and Mr. Davis believed he was referring to 101st Avenue. <br />and that he was speaking about direct paving costs, which did not <br />include the engineering and some other surveying costs needed to <br />complete the project. He noted that those figures are in line <br />with the figures we are projecting at this point in time. <br />Mrs. Manning believed that everyone has misunderstood this <br />as she thought he had stated that after 101st was completed, <br />there would be a surplus of funds that could go towards 91st <br />Avenue, and Mr. Davis confirmed that he did indicate that after <br />the paving of 101st, there would be surplus funds that could be <br />used to further implement the master drainage plan or for <br />additional paving. <br />John Coppola, vice president of the Vero Lake Estates <br />Property Owners Association, and resident of 7950 93rd Avenue, <br />referred to the $402,000 revenue Mr. Davis has predicted the 2 <br />year assessment at $50 parcel/acre will raise and asked if that <br />will earn interest, and if it does, shouldn't that interest be <br />added into the recommendation. <br />Director Davis pointed out that it is hard for us to predict <br />when the assessments will be paid and how long those funds will <br />be sitting there before they are expended out; so, as a <br />conservative measure, we have not computed additional interest <br />revenue. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt the key is that whatever is <br />earned stays in that fund. <br />Mrs. C. R. Smith, 8245 104th Court, commented that everyone <br />this evening has been talking about roads, but she wished to know <br />8 <br />