My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/23/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
7/23/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:39:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/23/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 23 19191H, <br />aooK 3 F�cE D <br />Under discussion Commissioner Scurlock inquired whether the <br />flow of new impact fees would allow us to issue less than the <br />maximum debt. OMB Director Baird stated we have not determined <br />that as yet. This is just the very first stage where we have <br />Farmers Home approval and are getting a bond document passed for <br />validation. <br />COUNTY ATTORNEY CONTRACT <br />The Board reviewed memo from County Attorney Charles Vitunac <br />dated July 17, 1991: <br />.TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney <br />DATE: July 17, 1991 <br />RE: COUNTY ATTORNEY'S CONTRACT <br />As discussed at the July 17, 1991, preliminary budget hearing, I <br />offer the attached amendment to my employment contract, which <br />incorporates all the changes suggested by the Board of County <br />Commissioners. <br />On an another issue discussed at that meeting, Commissioner Eggert <br />indicated that she wanted the two Assistant County Attorneys to have a <br />cap set on their salaries also. As it turns out, these positions have <br />maximum salaries set by the Board of County Commissioners several <br />years ago. A copy of the salary limits for our whole office is attached. <br />County Attorney Vitunac proposed several amendments to his <br />contract with the County. In paragraph A.1. of the contract, the <br />salary cap would be changed from $85,000 to $82,000. In paragraph <br />A.2., the fourth line, change "County employees" to "County <br />department heads." In other words, if County department heads <br />receive a cast -of -living raise less than what the general County <br />employees get, that would be what the County attorney would <br />receive. <br />Commissioner Eggert stated her preference was to have the <br />County Attorney's contract read the same as County Administrator <br />Chandler's contract. She quoted from Mr. Chandler's contract: "In <br />advance of each new fiscal year County Administrator shall discuss <br />Administrator's performance and shall mutually agree on any salary <br />increase, which increase shall become effective October 1 of each <br />year." <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.