My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/20/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
8/20/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:36:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/20/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />As required by the Agreement, Kimley-Horn has already field <br />staked each golf hole at the. tee, green and landing areas <br />along the centerline of all holes. The revisions that have <br />been made to the site plan will require recalculating 18 <br />control point locations, providing a new stakeout sheet and <br />restaking 18 points in the field. <br />The compensation due the Consultant for the attached <br />amendment is $1,860. This, added to the current contract <br />amount of $69,800 will result in a new contract amount of <br />$71,660. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING <br />Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to <br />sign the attached Amendment No. I. Funding is from Account <br />No. 418-000-169-018.00 - WIP-Sandridge Phase II. <br />Public Works Director Jim Davis explained that this is an <br />amendment to the contract with Kimley-Horn & Associates for <br />Sandridge Golf Course New 18 to provide some additional <br />consultant services which are mainly due to some allocation and <br />additional right-of-way for Kings Highway. The additional <br />right-of-way is being set aside and there is some additional <br />survey cost associated with that. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked if this was unanticipated. <br />Director Davis felt it wasn't unanticipated on the County's <br />behalf, but perhaps the consultant didn't plan for it and build <br />it into his original fee structure on the project. However, it <br />always has been in our Code that we will look at our Thoroughfare <br />Plan and make sure that development doesn't encroach upon our <br />Thoroughfare Plan right-of-ways. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt the question is why we should be <br />at risk and why shouldn't the architect pay for not paying <br />attention to the plans. <br />Director Davis advised that there is more than one <br />consultant involved here -- the golf course consultant who is <br />designing the course along with the surveying and engineering <br />AUG 2 0 19,91 39 BOOK 8-11 FACE � e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.