My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/3/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
9/3/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:38:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/03/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M. <br />3 1991 <br />BOOK <br />to say that we don't regulate them - we are not interested in the <br />franchise. Commissioner Scurlock felt we do have an ability in <br />that regard and we should pursue it, especially with the concern <br />of Lost Tree and the need for additional re -use water. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked if they have said they needed to <br />stay private since they drilled that well out on Gem Island. <br />Director Pinto advised that we haven't talked to them in <br />several months, and he understood they are talking about <br />transferring the ownership of that line. <br />Commissioner Scurlock did agree that the ownership of the <br />line, etc., is quite complicated, but felt we should renew our <br />efforts in that area. <br />Director Pinto wanted everyone to understand that a meeting <br />was held in his office with this group and their attorney, and we <br />brought up about the bridge and no permit. They were to submit <br />to this Board all the information that made their line a <br />legitimate legal line, and we -were told not to do anything until <br />that took place. <br />Commissioner Scurlock advised that all we have gotten so far <br />is proof of insurance, but in terms of any legitimacy for that <br />line to be placed there, we have nothing. He noted that another <br />important fact is that they do not have a R/W permit. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt that our approach should be nego- <br />tiation rather than litigation, and Commissioner Eggert believed <br />we have had a change of players. <br />Utilities Director Pinto further noted that this goes all <br />the way back to the years when Gary Brandenburg was County <br />Attorney, and we put them on notice that they should be <br />franchised. <br />Discussion followed as to whether the main people involved <br />will be available for the meeting scheduled on September 17th. <br />It was explained that John Morrison is heading up the group which <br />has to do with the internal use of the effluent, but that is <br />different than the club that owns the line. <br />Discussion continued regarding the potential for mutual <br />cooperation to legitimize the line and concern about the <br />September date, and Attorney Vitunac advised that he would like <br />to ask that the Town of Indian River Shores sign that agreement <br />also as he was not comfortable with having the County make an <br />agreement with J.I.W.S., Inc. without the Town's signature also. <br />Chairman Bird asked that, in the meantime, the Board address <br />the item before us in regard to approving the Change Order <br />recommended by staff. <br />24 <br />u <br />_I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.