Laserfiche WebLink
NOV 19 1991BOOK64 F' �E <br />subdivision which abuts U.S. #1 via a feeder road, U.S. #1 is <br />classified as an urban principal arterial on the future roadway <br />thoroughfare plan map. This segment of U.S. #1 is a four lane <br />divided, paved road with approximately one -hundred -twenty (120) <br />feet of existing public road right-of-way. <br />ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />application will be presented, The analysis will include a <br />description of: <br />* concurrency of public facilities <br />* compatibility with the surrounding areas <br />* consistency with the comprehensive plan <br />* potential impact on environmental quality <br />This section will also consider alternatives for development of the <br />site. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />The site is located within the county Urban Service Area (USA), an <br />area deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive <br />Plan. establishes standards fors Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The Comprehensive Plan also requires that new development be <br />reviewed to ensure that the minimum adopted level of service <br />standards for these services and facilities are maintained. <br />Policy 3.2, of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning requests, <br />conditional concurrency review is required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since <br />comprehensive plan amendments and rezoning requests are not <br />projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be <br />based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon <br />the requested zoning district or land use designation. For <br />commercial comprehensive plan amendment requests, the most <br />intensive use (according to the county's LDR's) is retail <br />commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of <br />land proposed for redesignation. The site information used for the <br />concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. <br />Size <br />of <br />Property: ± <br />20.65 acres. <br />2. <br />Size <br />of <br />-Area to be <br />Rezoned/Redesigndted: ± 8.0 acres. <br />3. Existing Zoning Classification:'. RM -6, Multiple Family <br />Residential District, (up to 6 units/acre). <br />4. Existing Land Use Designation: <br />a. ± 4 acres: L-2, Low Density Residential (up to 6 units/ <br />acre). <br />b• ± 4 acres: M-1, Medium Density Residential (up to 8 <br />units/acre). <br />5. Proposed Zoning Classification: CG, General Commercial <br />District. <br />is <br />■ <br />ki <br />