11/19/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Nov 19 1991 criteria did not become effective until June 17, 1985. Subsequently, the county adopted new zoning district requirements,. including a new neighborhood commercial (CN) district, and -later in 1985, the three acre site was assigned to a CN district during the county's administrative rezoni g process. (See attachment #5 for a chronology of events.) ThN three acre site is the subject property now owned by Paul C. And Denise E. Minotty. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Pattern The present land use plan designation for this property is M-1, Medium -Density Residential up to 8 units/acre. The zoning is CN, Neighborhood Commercial District. All areas surrounding the subject property are also designated on the county's land use plan as M-1, Medium -Density Residential up to 8 units/acre. Properties to the north and west are zoned RM -8, Multiple Family Residential, up to 8 units/acre (Indian River Estates still owned by ACTS), while land to the east across 74th Avenue is zoned RMH-8, Mobile Home Residential up to 8 units/nacre (Village Green). To the south of the subject property is 4 ±3 acre tract designated as a neighborhood commercial node And zoned CN. This tract has been developed as the Seald Sweet administrative offices. The subject neighborhood commercial node is within 3,900 feet (0.72 mile) of the commercial/industrial node located at the intersection of I-95 and S.R. 60, and is within 300' of the developed neighborhood commercial node at the southwest corner of SR 60 and 74th Avenue (Seald Sweet). Site Plan and Building Permit ?information In 1988, David Robinson, acting on behalf of Arthur Newton, submitted a major site plan application to construct a 21,856 sq. ft. retail complex on this site:: (SP -MA -88-10-77). A site plan for the subject property was approved in 1989. The applicant did not satisfy all the conditions se forth as part of the site plan approval, and, therefore, the :ite plan was never released. The site plan expired on August 24', 1990. Consequently, no building permit has been issued, no construction has commenced, and currently there is no active Approved site plan to develop the site. ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES C Analysis Although the subject property has been designated for neighborhood commercial development for over lsix years, no development exists on the site and no approved site plans to develop the property exist. During that time, the neighborhood node located across S.R. 60 from the subject site has been devgloped and is occupied. Given the lack of development activity I,on this property, it is staff's position that terminating the neighborhood commercial node designation of the site for lack of development would be consistent with the -CN guidelines contained in Chapter 911 of the LDRs (see attachment #2). As established, the subject neighborhood node fails to meet the minimum separation distance between the site and other neighborhood commercial and commercial nodes. For that reason, termination of node approval would preclude reestablishment of a neighborhood node on the subject property. In addition, termination of neighborhood node approval in this case would eliminate an existing non- conforming zoning designation. Lastly, it should be noted thatlrecently no interest in developing neighborhood.commercial-uses on either the subject property or in the surrounding area has been expressed to staff. The last such development interest expressedjto staff involved the Seald Sweet site which has now been developed and is occupied. 44