Laserfiche WebLink
M M <br />waterbody littoral zone(s) exemption threshold size from 4 to <br />acre. The change would replace the 15 sq. ft. of planted _ <br />littoral zone per 1' of shoreline formula with the formula used <br />by the water management district. The water management district <br />requirement is that planted littoral zone coverage shall equal or <br />exceed 30% of the waterbody area. Finally, the change allows <br />projects that are required to provide mitigation for wetlands <br />filling or alteration to use required littoral zone areas to meet <br />mitigation requirements. <br />Commissioner Eggert inquired if this change tracked with the <br />Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, and Roland DeBlois, <br />Chief of Environmental Planning, advised that we did check it <br />against the TCRPC with some samples, and even though it is not <br />the same formula, it is fairly compatible. We didn't see that <br />there was a problem. <br />Director Keating pointed out that this was recommended by <br />the Professional Services Advisory Commission. <br />Chapter 934 - Section 49: <br />Director Boling noted that there are some proposed changes <br />to requirements for cut and fill balancing on single-family lots <br />in the floodplains. In addition to that, the Public Works Department <br />has proposed a fourth exemption as follows: <br />4. Development located within_ the Vero Lake Estates Municipal <br />Services Taxing Unit as referenced in ordinance No. 84-81, for <br />which a cut and fill waiver has been granted by the Board of <br />County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners may, <br />in its discretion, grant a waiver from the provisions of this <br />subsection upon the affirmative showing of the applicant, by <br />means of a competent engineering study, that the development <br />project, as designed, will meet all other requirements of the <br />Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Chapter and will <br />not create a material adverse impact on flood protection. <br />"REFERENCE P. 45 OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE" <br />13 8M C�i` I'Aa Jib <br />2 0 f 9 11 -.dA <br />