Laserfiche WebLink
Nov 2 0 1991 S4 <br />All <br />encroachment allowed for parking spaces. Staff has found that <br />most project designers incorporate dumpsters into parking lot <br />layouts. Since some parking lot areas are allowed to encroach <br />.into normal required setback areas, it is reasonable to allow <br />Idumpsters with appropriate landscaping to be located in the <br />same areas as a parking lot. Note: all dumpsters will <br />continue to be required to be visually screened. <br />Chapter 912: Single Family Development <br />**34.Section 34: [amends 912.05(1)] updates the single family <br />chapter by referencing the new C-3, AG -3, and Con -3 zoning <br />districts. <br />35. Section 35: [amends 912.07(3)] updates the single family <br />chapter in relation to the outcome of the Jackson right-of-way <br />case. Since the county is no longer requiring dedication of <br />road right-of-way in relation to the construction of single <br />family homes, all chapter 912 references to such requirements <br />are being deleted. Instead, language is being inserted that <br />strongly encourages single family residence applicants to <br />think ahead and set back from major roadways to accommodate <br />future right-of-way expansion. <br />36. Section 36: [amends 912.08(1)(c)] adds a reference to the <br />single family driveway culvert requirements set forth in the <br />stormwater chapter (930) [see section 46 of the proposed <br />ordinance]. <br />37. Section 37: [amends 912.07(1)(b)6.f(I) and (II)] parallels <br />section 32 of the proposed ordinance which eliminates required <br />setbacks between pools and easements. <br />Chapter 913: Subdivisions and Plats <br />38. Section 38: [amends 913.06(5)] updates affidavit of exemption <br />requirements to conform with A-1 zoning district requirements. <br />39. Section 39: [amends 913.07(5)(A)] clarifies that a land <br />development permit waiver carries the same concurrency <br />requirement as a land development permit (parallels section <br />8). <br />40. Section 40: [amends 913.09(6)(c)] references the driveway <br />location standards applied to lots in non -single family <br />subdivisions (found in chapter 952, Traffic). <br />41. Section 41: [amends 913.06(1)(c)] limits the unplatted parcel <br />=60' road right-of-way frontage provision to -the large parcel, <br />rural, zoning districts such as the A-1, A-21 A-3, Con -2, Con - <br />31 RFD, and RS -1 districts. Parcels within other districts <br />would be required to have an amount of road right-of-way <br />frontage greater than or equal to the minimum lot width of the <br />zoning district. <br />Chapter 914: Site Plan Review and Approval Procedures <br />*42. Section 42: [amends 914.06(4)(a)] allows -the submittal of a <br />concurrency certificate for a site plan project after <br />submittal of the site plan application. The concurrency <br />certificate would still need to be issued prior to any site <br />plan approval. However, the proposed amendment would allow <br />the developer the option to choose to apply for a concurrency <br />certificate and pay applicable impact fees at a later time in <br />the site plan review process. <br />N <br />