Laserfiche WebLink
- M <br />Currently, a proposed airport zoning ordinance is being staffed. This ordinance <br />proposes the establishment of an area 300 feet from either side of the runway center- <br />line, extending out from the threshold to 5000 feet — as a safety zone. Exhibit 4 <br />As a consequence of this proposed action, the school site plan has been revised to <br />confine the complex to the southern section of the site. This rearrangement places <br />the school buildings just outside the arbitrary redefined safety boundaries. We <br />consider this action purely an exercise in manipulation. The fact remains that <br />nothing has changed in terms of actually improving safety conditions. <br />The unanimous conclusions and recommendations by the Airport Director, FDOT <br />and FAA that the site is incompatible with aircraft operations, both from the stand- <br />point of safety and noise, remain valid. Precise safety zones cannot be defined. I <br />believe the Airport Director can validate this statement. <br />From first-hand daily experience, the homeowners can attest to the fact that <br />aircraft approaches and takeoffs on Runway 4 vary widely and overfly both the <br />northern and southern sections of the site. Furthermore, FDOT has stated most of <br />runway 11R/29L VFR traffic will also overfly the site. <br />To demonstrate the significant danger involved, I call your attention to Exhibit <br />and 6. Exhibit 5 shows actual plotted accident site distribution within a specified <br />safety area of a hypothetical runway. You will note, that if you reverse the direction <br />of landing to reflect Runway 4 orientation, ( Exhi it 6) the <br />heaviest accident concentration would be within the area of the proposed school site. <br />It is interesting to note that the accident study data shows that 85% of accidents <br />occur on the active runway or its overrun%underrun area and clear zones. <br />I would also like to point out that the airport director has offered to lease the <br />school an alternate site which is free of overflight and noise conditions. <br />Heavy Traffic On 43 Avenue <br />The proposed school site is also a dangerous area due to heavy volume of vehicular <br />traffic along the 43rd Avenue. The existing traffic on this two lane roadway creates <br />a very serious safety hazard for the students as well as their parents. <br />• 43rd Avenue – major artery for <br />• North/south automotive traffic <br />• Trucks from groves, UPS, Federal Express, etc. <br />• Emergency vehicles from the sheriffs station and fire and rescue station. <br />• Daily drop-off and pick-up of 200 students will significantly increase traffic <br />congestion on an already heavily travelled two lane artery. <br />• - Lack of turning lanes on 43rd Avenue at school location means that traffic <br />will be stalled in both directions during heavy early morning and evening travel <br />times while parents turn into and out of the school site. We can expect a <br />significant increase in the accident rate. <br />• Prozimity of the school to Holman Stadium with heavy traffic and parking <br />congestion along 43rd Avenue during spring training and other sporting or <br />amusement events constitutes yet another hazard to safety for students. <br />• History of high motor vehicle accident rate shown in Exhibit from the <br />Sheriffs department records indicates that a significant number of accidents <br />have occurred on 43rd Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed school site. <br />A Petition <br />In closing, I would like to present a petition signed by 138 homeowners who are <br />deeply concerned for safety of these young students. It would be difficult to live with <br />our consciences if a disasterous accident occurred and we had not spoken out. <br />SAID PETITIONS WERE NEVER RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF THE <br />CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />41 <br />NOV 2 6 199 <br />mu <br />