Laserfiche WebLink
I -I <br />®IC 0 411. 1991 <br />©onK <br />PAU <br />the provisions of 911.12(4)(E) shall not apply," referring to the <br />100 -foot setback. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously revised <br />Section 26, Paragraph 4, Uses, to read: "For single <br />family construction and alterations on such lots of <br />record, the provisions of 911.12(4)(E) shall not <br />apply." <br />Attorney Dill suggested staff may want to strike some lines in <br />911.12(4)(E) because they no longer make sense after the last <br />amendment. <br />Chairman Bird assured Mr. Dill it would be examined. <br />Administrator Chandler stated Ms. Sandra Roberts wished to <br />address the Board regarding the following: <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public Works Director <br />SUBJECT: Request by Ms. Sandra Roberts, Vero Lakes Estates <br />For County to Supply Fill and Trees <br />Due to Flood Plain Cut/Fill Balance <br />DAR: December 2, 1991 ' <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br />This morning, I spoke with Ms. Roberts regarding her request for <br />the County to supply her with some fill and trees to replace <br />those that were removed due to the County's cut and fill balance <br />requirement in the 100 Year Flood Plain portion of Vero Lakes <br />Estates. Ms. Roberts stated that this requirement was applied <br />only to her property and others in Vero Lakes Estates were not <br />required to comply. <br />In investigating her complaint, only two applications for <br />construction on one acre lots in Vero Lakes Estates were received <br />for property within the 100 Year Flood Plain in 1991 (Ms. Roberts <br />and Mrs. Manning). All others, to our knowledge, were for lots <br />under i acre and were exempt. Prior to 1991, staff was not <br />enforcing this requirement. New FEMA maps came out in 1989 and <br />better defined the 100 Year Flood Plain. When the new L.D.R.'s <br />were approved; staff began to enforce this requirement. <br />At this time, staff does not recommend supplying fill and trees <br />for this property since the County Code requires the cut and fill <br />balance. It appears that the code contains an appeal and <br />variance procedure if the property owner objected to the County <br />requirement. <br />Please contact me if you have any questions. If you concur I <br />will write Ms. Roberts a letter to that effect. Ms. Roberts <br />informed me that she would attend the special Board of County <br />Commissioners meeting on Wednesday evening, December the 4th, to <br />reiterate her request before the Board. <br />12 <br />