12/4/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Section 49: (Section 930.07[2][d]) Upon direction at the November 20 meeting, the following paragraph was added to this section to include exemptions from the single-family cut and fill requirement: Development located within the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit as referenced in Ordinance No. 84- 81, for which a cut and fill waiver has been granted by the Board of County Commissioners, the Board of County Commissioners may, in its discretion, grant a waiver from the provisions of this subsection upon the affirmative showing of the applicant, by means of a competent engineering study, that the development project, as designed, will meet all other requirements of the stormwater management and flood protection chapter and will not create a material adverse impact on flood protection. Section 53: (Section 932.06[4]) Mr. Boling handed out the following revision to this section: "Storage of boats is also subject to the requirements of Section 911.15(7), except that the provisions of Section 911.15(7)(b)1 shall not preclude a lot owner from authorizing a third party to store a boat on the owner's lot." Environmental Planning Chief Roland DeBlois explained that this revision was to clarify a somewhat vague reference to another section and it is specific to boats only. Also, there is reference to Section 911.15(7)(b)l, which was discussed at the November 20 meeting, which has reference to general limitations on the storage of recreational vehicles including boats on lots in general. It limits the number of boats that could be stored on any particular lot to one boat except for an additional boat not to exceed two weeks in any continuous time period or six weeks in any one-year period; that cross reference is important. Mr. DeBlois referred to the additional handout with language which Deputy County Attorney Will Collins suggested, and it reads as follows: "Storage of boats is also subject to the requirements of Section 911.15(7), except that the provisions of Section 911.15(7)(b)l shall not preclude a lot owner from authorizing a third party to store a boat on the owner's lot." Commissioner Eggert asked if that could say "house owner's lot," and Commissioner Scurlock noted that it says "lot" because it does not have to have a house on it. Mr. DeBlois addressed another issue which applies to the storage of boats generally, in that it is an accessory use. In the code there is another section under accessory uses that the boat storage cannot be there prior to the principal use. In other words, if someone has a vacant oceanfront lot, another section of the code prohibits boat storage until that principal use is established. F1 OF- C 0 4 199,11 BOOK PA E 0"'d