My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/7/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
1/7/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:30 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:52:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/07/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jim Wadsworth, president of the Sebastian Property Owners <br />Association, thanked the Board for allowing them to speak again <br />about the proposed construction of the Sebastian Twin Pairs <br />project. He noted that the Commissioners' backup packets contain <br />50 pages of opposition to the Twin Pairs project, either through <br />the newspapers, the Sebastian Planning & Zoning Board or through <br />the various home owners associations in the north end of the <br />county. Mr. Wadsworth emphasized that there has been opposition to <br />the project since 1984 and they have not changed their position. <br />The Sebastian Property Owners Association has been against this <br />since 1985 and has never changed their position. Last week they <br />appeared before the Sebastian City Council and appealed to them to <br />pass a resolution to put the question of the Twin Pairs out to <br />referendum in March. They feel that the taxpayers at the north end <br />of the county have jumped through many hoops to let everyone know <br />that they don't like the design of the Twin Pairs project. They <br />object to the transportation impact fees collected in District 3 <br />being spent on the construction of the Twin Pairs when they prefer <br />to see those monies spent on widening the existing roadway to the <br />necessary width to carry the traffic. The widening alternative <br />would not need additional traffic lights within 900 feet of each <br />other on U.S. #1, and would not put our children in double jeopardy <br />at the main intersection where the "Y" is going to come together <br />right there at the east end of the school property. There are <br />various and sundry other reasons why they disagree. Mr. Wadsworth <br />noted that Orange Heights is made up of 90% of retired people who <br />do not want this design. They understand from staff that it will <br />cost $1.2 million to widen the existing roadway compared to only <br />$750,000 to build the Twin Pair design, but they would like to <br />point out that if you take the $210,000 piece of property that the <br />County purchased out on U.S. #1 and take the existing railroad <br />right-of-way from the school easterly to U.S. A, you could raise <br />the additional monies to build the highway as the taxpayers in the <br />northern part of the county would like to see it done. They are <br />asking the Board to please reconsider their decision and go with <br />the alternate plan to widen the existing roadway. He understood <br />that the plan to widen the roadway is on file with the County, but <br />they have heard very little discussion about that alternate, and <br />they are asking the County to put it out to referendum in District <br />3 in the March election and let the people decide so that this <br />issue can be put to rest once and for all. The City of Sebastian <br />has agreed to pass a resolution to put this on the ballot and they <br />are asking the County do the same. In conclusion, Mr. Wadsworth <br />wished to emphasize that he is not for government by referendum, <br />27 <br />G <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.