My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/7/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
1/7/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:30 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:52:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/07/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JAM U 7 1992` <br />," <br />�DI SF� PAGE S <br />equates to. It is less than one mile. To implement the Twin Pairs <br />project, our latest cost estimate is $778,000,. so we are talking <br />about $770,000 difference in the two projects if you include right- <br />of-way acquisition at a bare minimum cost and do not include <br />severance damages and other possible complications. <br />Commissioner Bird really felt those figures are pretty <br />accurate. If we go with the alternative of widening the existing <br />roadway, we are looking at a year's delay and an increase of <br />$770,000 in construction costs. Those are the facts that should be <br />conveyed to the electorate so that they can make an educated vote. <br />This is basically why he has voted in favor of the Twin Pairs <br />project the last two times. <br />Charlie Styco, resident of Sebastian, commented that what <br />bothers him most about the proposed Twin Pairs design is the <br />disruption in traffic it would cause in two places on U.S #1. With <br />the road widening alternative, there would be only one red light on <br />U.S. #1. <br />Commissioner Bird advised that we have gone into that in depth <br />at prior meetings, and Director Davis explained that by splitting <br />the intersection, the left -turn movements can be segregated and <br />occur in a synchronized fashion and more traffic can be moved <br />through the intersection than if you consolidated all those turning <br />movements into one location. If you go to one location, it <br />probably would be a 4 to 8 -phase traffic signal, which means a <br />motorist has to wait until the left -turn movements are clear and <br />the through movements are clear. He must wait through at least 4 <br />phases of the signal as opposed to only 2 phases if the roadway is <br />split. We have talked to the DOT and they have no problem with the <br />Twin Pair design. They basically feel it is a good alternative, <br />which is why they are implementing a Twin Pairs project in Vero <br />Beach. <br />Commissioner Scurlock emphasized that at a recent workshop the <br />new consultant hired by the City of Sebastian confirmed that the <br />Twin Pairs project has a higher capacity to handle traffic than the <br />old alignment. That was said at our last meeting, and we went back <br />to the tape to confirm that. We have had two separate, independent <br />traffic consulting firms tell us that the Twin Pairs concept was <br />better, and as a Commissioner, he must rely on trained professional <br />opinions. Commissioner Scurlock was convinced that most of the <br />people do not fully understand the reasoning behind the design, and <br />he has yet to hear one professional come forward and say there is <br />a better design than the Twin Pairs design. <br />Lengthy discussion ensued about whether a referendum would be <br />advisable, and Supervisor of Elections Ann Robinson asked -to see a <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.