My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/28/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
1/28/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:30 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:02:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/28/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />On April 22, 1991, Code Enforcement staff sent a Notice of Public <br />Nuisance to Austin J. Taylor, owner of the subject property, <br />concerning a hazardous public nuisance condition on the subject <br />property. The subject property has a legal description as follows: <br />Parcel No.: 10333900001007000007.0 <br />A parcel of land 25.5 .feet by 201 feet abutting the west <br />side of the south 201 feet of Lot F, Vero Park <br />Subdivision Unit #21.an unrecorded plat. <br />The Respondent was cited for maintaining the property in violation <br />of Chapter 973.01 of the County Land Development Code, which <br />prohibits conditions on property that are. a health and safety <br />hazard to the general public, thereby being a public nuisance. <br />Specifically, the public nuisance was described as follows: <br />Dead australian pine trees that were a health and safety <br />hazard to the surrounding single-family residences. <br />The subject property was also posted as set forth in Section 973.09 <br />of the County Code, giving the Respondent thirty (30) days to abate <br />the nuisance. <br />The nuisance violation was not abated within the required thirty <br />(30) day time period. Therefore, in accordance with Section <br />973.04(2), County Code, County Personnel (i.e., the Road & Bridge <br />Division) cleared the nuisance violation. <br />Section 973.06(1) of the County Code requires that the cost of a <br />County nuisance abatement action shall be calculated and reported <br />to the Board of County Commissioners, who, by resolution, shall <br />assess such costs against the subject property. This matter is <br />presented herein to the Board for consideration to adopt said <br />resolution. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: <br />Section 973.06(1), Public Nuisances, of the Indian River --Land <br />Development Code specifically reads as follows: <br />"After abatement of a nuisance by the County, the cost <br />thereof to the County as to each lot, parcel or tract of <br />land shall be calculated and reported to the Board of <br />County Commissioners. Thereupon, the Board of County <br />Commissioners, by resolution, shall assess such costs <br />against such lots, parcel, or tract of land. Such <br />resolution shall describe the land and state the cost of <br />abatement, which shall include an administrative cost of <br />seventy-five dollars ($75.00) per lot. Such assessment <br />shall be legal, valid, and binding obligation upon the <br />property against which made until paid. The assessment <br />shall be due and payable thirty (30) days after the <br />mailing of a Notice of Assessment, after which interest <br />shall accrue at the rate of twelve (12) per cent per <br />annum on any unpaid portion thereof." <br />Cost for equipment use and labor, as indicated by the Road & Bridge <br />Division, plus the $75.00 administrative cost, calculates to be: <br />Labor R. & B. $ 525.12 <br />Tree Removal: $ 41690.00 <br />Administrative Fee: $ 75.00 <br />Total: $ 5,290.12 <br />7 <br />JAN 28 1992 <br />P0oK � Fr1�C •�. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.