My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/28/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
1/28/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:30 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:02:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/28/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE SECOND IS - CONSERVATION EASEMENT <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/22/92: <br />TO: James E. Chandler, <br />County Administrator <br />TEEROUGB: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public Works Director, <br />FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.ij �� <br />Capital Projects Manager <br />SUBJECT: Sandridge Golf Course Second 18 <br />Conservation Easement <br />DATE: January 22, 1992 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />Prior to initiating any wetland or mitigation construction <br />on the Second 18 of Sandridge Golf Course, the County must <br />record a Conservation Easement for wetland areas that must <br />be retained as a condition of the St. Johns River Water <br />Management District (SJRWMD) Permit. <br />Attached is a Grant of Conservation Easement to the SJRWMD. <br />Staff is currently working on Exhibit A which will describe <br />this easement. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING <br />Staff recommends that the Chairman be authorized to execute <br />the Conservation Easement as soon as Exhibit .A has been <br />attached and approved by the County Attorney. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, that the Board authorize the <br />Chairman to execute the Conservation Easement as soon <br />as Exhibit A has been attached and approved by the County <br />Attorney. <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Scurlock stated that he <br />understood that the problem on Exhibit A is just a legal question. <br />Apparently, we have identified what it is that we want to conserve <br />and it is just a matter of trying to work out a legal description <br />and matching it with the drawing. He further understood that this <br />is to meet the 2-1 mitigation effort for disturbing wetlands. <br />Commissioner Bowman inquired whether this was mitigation or <br />preservation, and Public Works Director Jim Davis explained that it <br />is preservation rather than mitigation. It will be an enhancement <br />to an existing area. <br />JAN 28'092, <br />II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.