My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/11/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
2/11/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2023 4:50:16 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:05:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/11/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB. 19YZ <br />BOOK 8b F`GE O, <br />point out that this landcould support 15 houses if it was <br />developed that way. With regard to the neighborhood's concern <br />about exterior lighting, they have agreed to the concept of <br />lowering the lighting. However, lowering the lighting to under 6 <br />feet really is not practical because residential lighting is <br />usually 6 to 7 feet high. It is a small detail, but it is just <br />realistic for residential lighting to be at normal residential <br />heights. They would like to see the language in condition #4 under <br />staff's recommendation modified to read: "Free standing site <br />lighting sources within the project shall not exceed 6 feet in <br />height, as measured from ground level, and shall be directed and <br />shielded. Lighting heights on buildings may be typical of single <br />story homes, which may include single -story soffit security <br />lighting. All exterior lighting is to be directed and shielded so <br />as to minimize any lighting or glare impacts on surrounding <br />properties". <br />Director Boling stated that staff has no objection to the <br />proposed modification because the main intent is to not have the <br />impact in this development be any different than if it were <br />developed for single family homes. <br />There being no others who wished to be heard, the Chairman <br />closed the Public Hearing. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved the <br />special exception change of use and granted conceptual <br />plan approval subject to the 4 conditions as set out in <br />the above staff recommendation, with modification to <br />condition #4 regarding the lighting as suggested by Mr. <br />Dean. <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMITTAL OF GRANT APPLICATION TO FLORIDA DNR <br />FOR FUNDING OF BEACH EROSION CONTROL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/3/92: <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.