My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/3/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
3/3/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:11:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/03/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />MAR 0 3 199 <br />BOOK <br />of the fastest notices to proceed ever made, not on a hospital <br />project that would have been an emergency matter, but on the <br />construction of a golf course. Rather than waiting to make sure <br />just what had occurred and making sure that the Board had acted <br />appropriately under the circumstances, the County issued a notice <br />to proceed and the contractor is now geared up to perform the work. <br />In conclusion, Attorney Lawrence emphasized that all they are <br />asking is an 8-dsy delay so that the County does not potentially <br />encounter further costs from Guettler & Sons that would have to be <br />paid and at the same time have to pay Prince Contracting Company <br />who was supposed to have done that work if Judge Smith so rules. <br />On that basis, he believed a delay would be a sound business <br />decision, both legally and morally. He thanked the Board for the <br />opportunity to speak today. <br />Attorney Lyman Reynolds, representing the Board of County <br />Commissioners in this matter, advised that the suit filed by Prince <br />Contracting Company for a temporary injunction is an extraordinary <br />legal relief which seeks to maintain the status quo. In the <br />present situation involving a contract, there is a status quo where <br />the contract was issued and executed on behalf of the county on <br />February 18, 1992. A pre -construction was noticed February 21, <br />1992 and held on Wednesday, February 26, 1992 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. <br />Following that pre -construction conference, a notice to proceed was <br />issued February 26, 1992 to Phillip Guettler, president of Guettler <br />& Sons. That is the status quo at the present time and should <br />remain. <br />Chairman Eggert asked Deputy County Attorney William Collins <br />if he had anything to say before she opened the matter up for <br />questions or comments, but Attorney Collins preferred to let <br />Attorney Reynolds speak with one voice for the Commission. If <br />asked, he would answer, but he would prefer that we speak with one <br />voice. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that one of his main concerns was the <br />timing of this project so that this project would get started as <br />soon as possible and be completed as expeditiously as possible in <br />order to get the course developed, grown in, and open for the <br />winter season of 1992/93. He felt a further delay in the project <br />would make that time table much more difficult to attain. <br />Commissioner Bird felt he was looking for a little bit more legal <br />guidance from our Legal Department about placing ourselves in a <br />position of least jeopardy or vulnerability with both contractors <br />in mind. He inquired about the financial down side if Guettler <br />proceeds to work during the next 8 days and the Court makes some - <br />sort of a ruling that causes the County to change -to Prince <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.