Laserfiche WebLink
Seald Sweet on the southwest corner, a grove on another corner, and <br />Indian River Estates with the beauty shops, nursing, medical <br />facilities, which he felt was not pure residential use; therefore, <br />he felt this parcel is located within an area dominated by non- <br />residential use. <br />Chairman Eggert guessed it could be a commercial node. <br />Attorney Stewart argued that it is a neighborhood commercial <br />node. The exception in the ordinance states that if you abut a <br />commercial node; PRO is acceptable. Planning staff took the <br />position that the neighborhood is not a commercial node, but the <br />Commercial Development ordinance uses the phrase "commercial node" <br />many times, and if this should not be a commercial, then the <br />wording of that ordinance should be changed. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating explained that as <br />far as the wording pointed out by Mr. Stewart, staff differentiates <br />between neighborhood commercial nodes and the wording "commercial <br />node or corridor" because the intended meaning was "the commercial <br />nodes or corridors as delineated in the Comp Plan." <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked for clarification on the land use <br />designation of the grove and the non-residential aspect of Indian <br />River Estates Life Care Facility. <br />Community Development Director Keating considered Indian River <br />Estates a residential use. The grove would be considered a holding <br />type of use and since it is not considered non-residential and it <br />is not residential per se, staff considers it a wash. <br />Chairman Eggert noted that the PRO District size requirement <br />does not say it must be reduced to 2.5 acres, and Attorney Vitunac <br />agreed that even though it meets all three criteria, the ordinance <br />states that it "may" be reduced, not "must" be reduced. <br />The Chairman determined that no one else wished to be heard <br />and thereupon closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, to adopt Ordinance No. 92-04 <br />amending the zoning ordinance and the accompanying <br />zoning map from CN to PRO, for the property <br />generally located on the northwest corner of State <br />Road 60 and 74th Avenue, as recommended by the <br />Planning and zoning Commission. <br />Under discussion, Chairman Eggert believed it should not be <br />PRO because she remembered that discussion and the intent was that <br />all three criteria had to be met. <br />W. <br />L_ OAR 101 <br />