Laserfiche WebLink
major -site plan requirements. The reason that prompted this LDR <br />amendment is to be able to use property in a more or less rural <br />area for a commercial type business without all the front-end costs <br />of site plan requirements. He wished to note that he has lost his <br />funding for this current year for the center, but with the approval <br />of these amendments he intends to apply for it next year because he <br />feels that the need for this facility is just as great as it ever <br />has been. <br />There being no others who wished to be heard, the Chairman <br />closed the Public Hearing on Section 1. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner <br />Scurlock, the Board unanimously directed staff to follow <br />the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission to <br />allow a paving waiver under the 12 criteria but delete <br />from criterion #8 the following phrase: "...as well as <br />a base on top of the subgrade consisting of FDOT base <br />Group 4 or greater." <br />Sections 24 and 25 <br />Director Boling advised that it is staff's position that <br />regardless of what is stored in these facilities, they still have <br />a lot of characteristics of a warehouse and that taking it down <br />below the CG District (General Commercial District) is not <br />appropriate. It is the applicant's position that the CL District <br />(Limited Commercial District) should allow this type of use as a <br />convenience to residents and that the proposed criteria they have <br />submitted afford the protection and buffering, etc. Staff and the <br />P&Z are recommending that neither Sections 24 nor 25 be adopted. <br />Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard with regard to Sections 24 and 25. <br />Attorney Michael O'Haire, representing Karl and Keith Hedin, <br />agreed with Director Boling that CL is not appropriate for <br />13 <br />P k 0 83 19A <br />