Laserfiche WebLink
APR U'Z 1992 BOOK <br />pp <br />OOIyy 8 i,�6 `. PA UE 0 9 <br />Planning Director Stan Boling announced that this is the first <br />of two final public hearings on the current LDR amendments. At the <br />close of this evening's meeting, the Board will direct staff to <br />make any changes to the proposed amendments and announce its <br />intention to adopt the proposed amendments by ordinance on <br />Wednesday, April 22, 1992 at 5:01 o'clock P.M. in Commission <br />Chambers. Director Boling advised that he would begin by going <br />over two controversial issues which involve Section 1 and Sections <br />24 and 25. Section 1 concerns the paving waiver issue that was <br />initiated by the Graves Brother, Inc. site plan for a child care <br />center. Sections 24 and 25 were proposed by Karl Hedin for the <br />allowance of self storage facilities as a special exception use in <br />the CL District (Limited Commercial District). <br />Section 1: Amend Section 954.10(3)- Paving Waiver Proposal <br />Criteria 1 and 8 <br />Director Boling advised that it is staff's opinion that no <br />change should be made in the ordinances and that Section 1 should <br />not be adopted. However, if the Board decides that a paving waiver <br />should be granted, staff's position is that it should meet the <br />proposed 12 criteria. The Professional Services Advisory Committee <br />(PSAC) recommends all 12 criteria except for #1 and the last <br />sentence in the first paragraph in #8 which calls for a base on top <br />of a subgrade. The Planning & Zoning Commission recommends all 12 <br />criteria including #1, but excluding the base requirement in <br />criterion #8. The 12 criteria are meant to address some of the <br />concerns the best way possible in an unpaved parking situation. <br />Criterion #1 limits this type of paving waiver to areas located <br />outside the urban service area and makes a distinction between what <br />we consider rural locations and more urban locations. As it is <br />presently written, criterion #8 would require a subgrade instead of <br />paving with a base material on top of the subgrade. In a normal <br />paving situation, you would have a subgrade and a base and you <br />8 <br />