My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/14/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
4/14/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:52:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/14/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County and even though the developer is paying in a form which <br />happens to be checks from somebody else, the developer is <br />responsible for any shortage. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt the residents may feel they have a <br />right to reimbursement at a future time when they sell their units <br />and he wanted to be sure there will be no difficulty on this point. <br />County Attorney Vitunac advised that we have enough <br />documentation with our original agreement. <br />Director Pinto suggested that when we receive the checks we <br />can list the checks on the receipt and specify that these checks <br />were received on behalf of the developer. Then the developer can <br />take that receipt and copy it for the individuals if he so chooses, <br />but we will not deal with individual residents. <br />Commissioner Bird was in favor of that procedure to create a <br />paper trail because he felt the residents have some plan in mind, <br />otherwise they would not pay individually. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bird, to approve staff's <br />recommendation and develop the appropriate paper <br />trail. <br />Chairman Eggert recognized Attorney Bruce Barkett, who asked <br />for clarification of the motion. He thought staff's recommendation <br />was to accept the 80 checks and send out a certified letter to say <br />the County will not accept them anymore. <br />Chairman Eggert clarified that the motion was for the modified <br />recommendation, and Commissioner Bowman asked to have the motion <br />restated. <br />Commissioner Scurlock withdrew his motion. <br />Director Pinto stated that his modified recommendation is what <br />he understood the motion to be, that we accept checks and establish <br />the paper trail with the receipt and continue to accept checks in <br />that manner. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved <br />staff's recommendation to accept checks and <br />establish a paper trail by listing the individual <br />payors on the receipt, specifying that these checks <br />were received on behalf of the developer, and <br />continue to accept checks in this manner from <br />individuals for payment of impact fees due from <br />Heron Cay. <br />57 <br />APR 14 1992 <br />�[iK FN�E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.