My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/21/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
4/21/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:53:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/21/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 2 11992 ,orK r.,,t "x.06° <br />felt Attorney Garris' point is whether it is necessary to go <br />directly to County Court at that time or have an alternate hearing <br />body that could intervene at that point. <br />Attorney Vitunac clarified that the law puts this as an <br />alternate and does not forbid additional ways of enforcing this. <br />He didn't think it would be illegal to put a step between the <br />citation and County Court. <br />Attorney Garris suggested putting in a special -master -to serve <br />as a trial jury. <br />Mr. DeBlois explained that staff got this directly from the <br />State Statutes and if there is that discretion of putting in a <br />special master, they certainly would have no objection. <br />Attorney Vitunac wanted more time to research this further, <br />but he didn't anticipate a problem. <br />Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien noted there are a lot <br />of "shalls" in the proposed ordinance, and agreed that we certainly <br />could take a look at putting in a special master as an intermediate <br />step. <br />Attorney Vitunac believed that would be legal if the alleged <br />violator and the County agreed to step aside for awhile and have a <br />special master look at it, but if the violator wants to go to his <br />appeal rights, he would go to the County Court. He didn't see any <br />problem in making it a voluntary step to go before a special master <br />where the findings would be binding on both parties. If the Board <br />so directs, staff will insert that special master step. <br />Leroy Hiers of United Irrigation felt the Board would be <br />jeopardizing the contractors' trades by not adopting the proposed <br />ordinance. He felt he probably complains more to the Building <br />Department than anyone else about contractors who do not obtain a <br />license or comply with all the requirements. He believed this all <br />boils down to using common sense and he urged the Board to adopt <br />the proposed ordinance. <br />There being no others who wished to be heard in this matter, <br />the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Wheeler, that the Board adopt Ordinance <br />92-09, amending Chapter 103 of the County Code, with the <br />modification to insert between Citation Issued and County <br />Court the ability for binding arbitration before a <br />special master. <br />Under discussion; Mr. DeBlois advised that subsequent to the <br />drafting of Attachment A, Resolution of Rates, staff found that the <br />County had adopted a resolution last October that set forth fines <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.