Laserfiche WebLink
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study <br /> Table A-3 <br /> Residents per Housing Unit(Unincorporated IRC) <br /> (1) Housing (3) Residents Residents <br /> Housing Type Population (2) Ratio Housing Housing Units <br /> Units units(4) with 0 •, <br /> Single Family(detached) 5Z,4ZUI 20,997 2.50 2.33 <br /> Less than 1,000 sf 87% 2.18 2.03 <br /> 1,000 to 1,499 sf 94% 2.35 2.19 <br /> 1,500 to 2,499 sf 100% 2.50 2.33 <br /> 2,500 sf or greater 111% 2.78 2.59 <br /> Multi-Family/Accessory 14,195 9,923 1.43 1.33 <br /> Mobile Home 7,454 5,378 1.39 1.30 <br /> Weighted Average 74,069 36,298 2.04 1.90 <br /> (1) Source:2000 Census,Table H-33(adjusted for peak seasonal population) <br /> (2) Source:2000 Census,Table H-30 <br /> (3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey <br /> (4) Population(Item 1)divided by housing units(Item 2) <br /> (5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the <br /> decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 <br /> Table A-4 <br /> Residents per Housing Unit(IRC excluding Indian River Shores) <br /> (1) Housing (3) Residents Residents <br /> Housing Type Population (2) Ratio Housing Housing Units <br /> Units Units(4) rr • <br /> Single Family(detached) 81,290 33,010 2.46 2.29 <br /> Less than 1,000 sf 87% 2.14 1.99 <br /> 1,000 to 1,499 sf 94% 2.31 2.15 <br /> 1,500 to 2,499 sf 100% 2.46 2.29 <br /> 2,500 sf or greater 111% 2.73 2.54 <br /> Multi-Family/Accessory 21,493 15,176 1.42 1.32 <br /> Mobile Home 10,516 6,786 1.55 1.44 <br /> Weighted Average 113,299 54,972 2.06 1.92 <br /> (1) Source:2000 Census,Table H-33(adjusted for peak seasonal population) <br /> (2) Source:2000 Census,Table H-30 <br /> (3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey <br /> (4) Population(Item 1)divided by housing units(Item 2) <br /> (5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the <br /> decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 <br /> Functional Population <br /> Functional population, as used in the impact fee analysis, is a generally accepted <br /> methodology for several impact fee areas and is based on the assumption that demand for <br /> certain facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people at a land use, including <br /> residents, employees, and visitors. It is not enough to simply add resident population to the <br /> Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br /> June 2014 A-4 Impact Fee Update Study <br /> � 8� <br />