My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/19/2014BCC
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
08/19/2014BCC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 12:24:24 PM
Creation date
3/3/2016 10:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Reconnection/Water Farming August 2014 <br />Page 6 <br />In his report, the Chair of the Committee, further adds that apparently the aforementioned <br />reasons that Martin County expressed in support for the establishment of a reservoir system were <br />also used by those northern coastal communities bordering the lagoon and these communities <br />were successful in having many of the diversion projects eliminated. In fact in a report of the <br />Jacksonville District Engineer dated November 15, 1956, regarding changes to previous <br />Congressional authorizations as contained in House Document 186 85`" Congress, the report <br />notes that previously approved projects C-26; S -51;C-27; S-52 ; C-28; S-54 were to be <br />eliminated from the project plan as these canals and structures were intended to divert water to <br />the Indian River. The District Engineer's report states that as the method of flood control has <br />changed from diversion to storage, these canals and structures are no longer needed and would be <br />replaced by eight impounding levees and controls required for the recently projected reservoir <br />system. <br />The report of the Chair as printed in the 1959 news article goes into significant detail as to the <br />benefits of the inter -connected systems and flood control by storage as opposed to flood control <br />by diversion and the inability/reluctance of the Flood Control District to listen and respond <br />accordingly to the concerns of the Martin County area. <br />The concerns and solutions expressed in the 1959 report could easily be dated today, and be very <br />contemporary to everyday dialogue relative to the health of the lagoon. What was highlighted as <br />regional benefits through reservoir storage over 50 years ago, still hold true today and form the <br />`► foundation for the regional reconnection/attenuation project. <br />With the legislative development of Florida Chapter 373 -Water Resources, Chapter 373.069 <br />established at 11:59 PM on December 31, 1976, the States' five Water Management Districts. <br />As a result, the project area identified previously in the 1948 and 1954 Flood Control Acts, and <br />as within the then jurisdiction of the Central and South Florida Flood Control District, was <br />separated jurisdictionally and hydraulically into the newly created SJRWMD and the SFWMD. <br />At the time of this legislative creation of the Water Management Districts, the line of <br />demarcation for this SJRWMD and SFWMD jurisdiction / hydraulic separation was and <br />remains today, the Indian River and St. Lucie County line. <br />As efforts move forward on identifying and correcting detrimental situations relative to the health <br />of the Indian River Lagoon system in conjunction with the Comprehensive Everglades <br />Restoration Project (CERP), the growing acknowledgment was that excess stormwater being <br />discharged into the lagoon system was detrimental to the overall health of the whole lagoon <br />system. This increasing awareness and growing realization, in combination with the concerns of <br />the rapid depletion of ground water and associated re -charge of this ground -water, the need for <br />alternative surface water supplies and the ongoing need for more effective water management <br />during the rainy season for use during the dry season, served to heightened the positive attributes <br />associated with the earlier authorized project and the continuing benefits associated with the <br />proposed re -connection and the accompanying reservoir systems as called for in the 1954 Flood <br />Control Act. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.