My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/5/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
5/5/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:56:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Robert Keating advised that <br />this a request just to change the Comp Plan. The zoning is in <br />place and would not need to be changed. He recapped that when this <br />land use amendment was transmitted to Tallahassee last November, <br />statements were made by staff of the Fellsmere Farms Water Control <br />District,' their consulting engineer and County Public Works <br />Director Jim Davis expressing concern about redesignating the <br />subject property given the infrastructure deficiencies which exist <br />on that particular tract. At the transmittal hearing in November, <br />1991, staff recommended approval of transmittal with the <br />recommendation that the Board direct staff to work with the <br />applicant and try to structure an amendment to the LDRs that would <br />require this particular applicant to make infrastructure <br />improvements with the lot splits. After transmittal, staff worked <br />extensively with Public Works staff and the County Attorney's staff <br />and met with the applicant a number of times on several options to <br />resolve the situation. We encouraged the applicant to establish a <br />property owners' association and a deed restriction as we felt <br />those legal documents could be structure and held in escrow by the <br />applicant's attorney or the County Attorney's staff and recorded <br />upon approval of this request. The problem we had in dealing with <br />the applicant's attorney in this particular situation is that we <br />could not get to the point where there were adequate provisions or <br />guarantees that roads would be created or upgraded and maintained <br />and that those provisions would be put into the legal documents. <br />That is the- major reason why staff is recommending denial. <br />However, staff does feel we have resolved most of the DCA's <br />objections to this Comp Plan amendment. <br />Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />Attorney Bruce Barkett, representing Albert Kahn, gave a brief <br />recap of the history of this land -use amendment request, recalling <br />that at the transmittal meeting, it was felt that the best approach <br />to solving the infrastructure concerns would be for the applicant <br />to create road access easements with a property owners' association <br />responsible for maintaining them through assessment and lien <br />powers. He reviewed his letter to the Board dated May 4, 1992: <br />103 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.