My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/5/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
5/5/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:56:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK bb <br />recommended that Attorney Barkett revise his documents to do that. <br />Then, if any construction or maintenance responsibilities fall to <br />the County, we would have the M.S.T.U. option to assess the cost <br />back if they had not made improvements to County standards through <br />their own assessment powers. <br />Attorney Vitunac felt that what it comes down to is that the <br />Board should make a motion to approve whatever land use they think <br />is appropriate, and after that, Attorney Barkett will do whatever <br />he should do. <br />Attorney Barkett asked to be- told what the motion says for him <br />to do so that he could say whether he could do it because he wanted <br />to make sure. Referring to the document in front of the Board <br />today, the Property Owners' Association with the Declaration of <br />Covenants and Restriction, he stated that it is unquestionable that <br />they are willing to do that. <br />Attorney Collins understood the following as it relates to the <br />documents prepared by Attorney Barkett: <br />1) We are talking about 60 feet of road width rather than 30 <br />feet of right-of-way. <br />2) As the documents are set up right now, they would be <br />granting cross easements to each member of the <br />association, and what is being suggested instead is that <br />the rights-of-way be dedicated to the property owners' <br />association so that if at some point in the future the <br />association wanted to approach the County to transfer <br />maintenance or construction responsibilities, the property <br />owners' association would be able to convey without having <br />to go back to each of those lot owners as easement <br />holders. <br />Attorney Barkett stated that would be agreeable as it would be <br />a simple amendment of just one line, and he added that the document <br />would be recorded this afternoon. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that with that understanding he was <br />ready to make a motion. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, that the Board adopt Ordinance <br />92-21, amending the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive <br />Plan for ±888 acres from AG -2 to AG -1 for property <br />located west and south of the City of Fellsmere, south of <br />CR -512. <br />110 <br />_ M M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.