Laserfiche WebLink
IMAM' 0 51992 aooK b F' „E 113 <br />ISIS <br />DISCUSSION OF STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY AT THE S.W. CORNER OF SR 60 <br />AND I-95 <br />Commissioner Bird announced that he had a conflict of interest <br />on this item in that his company has listings on property <br />surrounding this property and has filed the necessary Conflict of <br />Interest form with the Clerk's Office. He thereupon left Chambers <br />until the conclusion of this item. (CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS ON <br />FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD) <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 4/29/92: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Robert M. Rea i , A <br />Community DevelopmerVe Director <br />FROM: Stan Boling, AICP - <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: April 29, 1992 <br />SUBJECT: County Letter of "No Interest" for State Surplus Property <br />at the S.W. Corner S.R. 60/I-95 <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of May 5, 1992. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />The State owns surplus property near the southwest corner of S.R.60 <br />and I-95 as shown on the attached location map (tax parcel #03-33- <br />38-00001-0100-00004.0). A few years ago, the county utilities <br />service department had considered purchasing the property as part <br />of an effluent re -use project. Recently, the office of State <br />Representative Charles W. Sembler II requested that the county <br />verify by letter to the State Division of Lands that it no longer <br />has any interest in purchasing the subject property. Apparently <br />the State has a potential buyer for the property and wants to <br />ensure that the sale of the property would not disrupt any county <br />plans. County planning staff has coordinated with other county <br />departments and concludes that no departments have any interest in <br />county acquisition of the subject property. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />Staff members from applicable county departments have reviewed the <br />"subject property" maps which were FAXED to the county by <br />Representative Sembler's office. Staff members responded as <br />follows: <br />Environmental Planning Chief Roland DeBlois: the subject <br />property is not under consideration by the Land Acquisition <br />Advisory Committee (LAAC) for acquisition. <br />136 <br />® s � <br />