My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/5/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
5/5/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:56:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 0 5 .1997 <br />BOOK 8� FADE 0 0FU <br />* an oversight in the approved comprehensive plan, or <br />* a substantial change in circumstances affecting the <br />subject property <br />Based upon staff determination, this land use amendment does meet <br />one of the three criteria as stated above. <br />The first two criteria allow the county to approve a request to <br />amend the land use map only if a mistake or oversight was made <br />regarding the property during preparation of the comprehensive <br />plan. While preparing the comprehensive plan, the county analyzed <br />each commercial node and its market area and determined node size <br />based upon the amount of existing development and potential growth <br />projected through the year 2010 within the general market area of <br />the node. From this research, the county then established each <br />node boundary and specified each node's size. The 20 acres of <br />subject property that are the subject of this amendment request <br />were considered at that time and were not included in the U.S. #1 <br />-and 37th Street Hospital/Commercial Node. Therefore, there was no <br />mistake nor oversight made in relation to the subject property when <br />preparing the comprehensive plan. <br />The third criterion of Policy 13.3 allows the county to amend the <br />land use map if changes in circumstances affecting the subject <br />property have occurred since the 1990 adoption of the comprehensive <br />plan. Such a change could relate to the property itself, such as <br />an unforeseen adjacent incompatible use being established or a <br />significant change in adjacent development patterns having <br />occurred. <br />In this case, the subject property will be significantly affected <br />by the future construction of Indian River Boulevard on the site's <br />eastern boundary. The construction of the Boulevard will change <br />the development pattern in this area, as it will isolate the <br />subject property by creating a barrier to the east. By isolating <br />the subject property, the boulevard will separate the site from <br />comparably designated land to the east. As a result, the property <br />will become less suited to residential development by having <br />intense medical office uses contiguous to the west and a programmed <br />four (4) and ultimately six (6) lane roadway abutting to the east. <br />Staff feels that the construction of the boulevard constitutes a <br />change in circumstances, making the proposal consistent with policy <br />13.3. <br />-Future Land Use Policy 1.20 <br />Future Land Use Policy 1.20 states that nodes shall have a <br />designated size based on the intended use classification and <br />service area population, existing land use pattern and other demand <br />characteristics. A review of this policy with the Future Land Use <br />Element reveals that approximately 700 acres of land are currently <br />developed with commercial/ industrial land in the county. <br />According to the plan, approximately 31000 acres of land will be <br />needed for commercial/industrial uses in the future. Since ±5,000 <br />acres in the county are designated for commercial or industrial <br />uses, a surplus of ±2,000 acres of commercial/industrial designated <br />land exists in the county. While a change in the land use <br />designation of the subject property from residential to commercial <br />will affect these totals, other considerations must be made. <br />First, it must be noted that hospital/commercial nodes are <br />specialized areas with substantially different uses than other <br />types of nodes. Therefore, a comparison of this node with all <br />other nodes in terms of excess commercial acreage must consider <br />this fact. Secondly, the characteristics of the subject property, <br />particularly its physical separation from non -node land to the east <br />by the construction of Indian River Boulevard, affect its potential <br />use. This is a case where the property's inclusion in the node <br />would be warranted based upon its lack of suitability for <br />residential development rather than a market need to expand the node. <br />48 <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.