My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/5/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
5/5/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:56:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F - <br />MAY 0 51992 BOOK 04 <br />Alternatives for the Board of County Commissioners <br />There are two alternatives for the county to take concerning the <br />requested land use amendment: <br />1. Deny this request to amend the Future Land Use Map from L-1 to <br />Hospital/Commercial Node and deny the request to rezone the <br />property from RS -3 to MED, or <br />2. Approve this amendment as requested by the applicant. <br />Conclusion <br />Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and has found no <br />incompatibility between the proposed use and surrounding uses. In <br />addition, as previously discussed, the future extension of Indian <br />River Boulevard has provided a change in circumstances affecting <br />the subject property which would allow an amendment to the <br />comprehensive plan based upon Future Land Use Policy 13.3. <br />Despite these positive findings, staff has identified major <br />environmental issues which have not been addressed at this time. <br />These issues relate to the location of estuarine wetlands on the <br />subject property. Since the comprehensive plan addresses estuarine <br />wetlands through the assignment of an overlay district (the C-2 <br />district with a low one unit per 40 acre development density) to <br />those areas determined by environmental survey to be estuarine <br />wetlands, the redesignation of the subject property to <br />Hospital /Commercial node is not incompatible with the potential <br />wetlands characteristics of the subject property. In fact, because <br />the entire property is not a wetlands, the proposed redesignation <br />would provide a viable use for.uplands on the site, while the C-2 <br />overlay will protect wetlands. <br />It is staff's opinion that FDOT and DCA concerns relating to <br />traffic have been sufficiently addressed in the concurrency portion <br />of the analysis section. Staff supports the proposed land use <br />amendment, recognizing that the exact boundaries of the C-2 <br />district will be determined at the time of site development. The <br />portion then determined to be jurisdictional wetlands shall be <br />subject to the C-2 conservation designation and associated <br />development restrictions. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based upon the analysis performed and the comprehensive plan <br />requirement that estuarine wetlands delineated on the overall site <br />(prior to site development) shall have a C-2 conservation land use <br />designation, staff recommends that the Board of County <br />Commissioners approve the request to amend the Future Land Use Map <br />from L-1 to Hospital/Commercial Node and rezone the property from <br />RS -3 to MED. <br />52 <br />_I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.