5/5/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Board reviewed the following memo dated 4/27/92: TO: James Chandler County Administrator DIV ION HEAD CONCURRENCE r, 0-2 e -2 �_ V_W__ /0, .00 _. & - Robert Rea n ��11, AICP THROUGH: Sasan Rohani .5 ,k. Chief, Long -Ran a Planning FROM: Cheryl Tworek Senior Planne ng -Range Planning DATE: April 27, 1992 SUBJECT: Feldman Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate Approximately 40 Acres from AG -1 to R, to expand the Urban Service Area boundary to include an additional ±40 Acres, and to Rezone approximately 40 acres from RFD to RS -1 (LURA -91-07-0126) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of*May 5, 1992. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This is a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan and rezone property. The subject property is located on 58th Avenue, between 4th Street and lot Street, and is presently owned by David and Princess Feldman. The land consists of 40 acres. The request involves changing the land use designation for ±40 acres from AG -1, Agriculture (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to Rural Residential -(up to 1 unit/acre), rezoning 40 acres from RFD, Rural Fringe District (up to 1 unit/2.5 acres) to RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 unit/acre), and extending the urban service area west of 58th Avenue to the subject property's west boundary. The applicants intend to develop the property with residential uses. On September 26, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, conducted a public hearing for the Purpose of making a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners regarding this request. At that meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-2 to recommend the transmittal of the proposed land -use amendment request. On November 12, 1991, the Board of County Commissioners voted 5 to 0 to transmit the above referenced land use amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), and announced their intention to hold a final public hearing concerning this amendment. - DCA Objections Planning staff received DCA's Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report on March 9, 1992. For this proposed amendment, the DCA ORC report contained several substantive objections. Identified as inconsistencies with state law (9J-5. FAC and 163, F -S.), with the state comprehensive plan, and with the comprehensive regional plan, these objections focused the premature development of agriculturally designated on the proliferation of urban sprawl. gnated lands and 63 II