Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC DISCUSSIONS <br />NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM <br />Dr. Peter Fallon came before the Board to request a Resolution <br />in opposition to Senate Bill 1650 Regarding Title XI of the <br />National Flood Insurance Mitigation and Erosion Management Act of <br />1992. He explained that $750 million worth of buildings along the <br />coastline will be affected, which amounts to 15 to 17 percent of <br />the tax roll, or $12 to $14 million in actual cash. This action <br />will cause the present setback lines to be replaced by zones of <br />significant, moderate and greatest erosion, and structures within <br />those zones would lose their flood insurance, and without flood <br />insurance those buildings would not have any marketable value. If <br />the bill passes, Dr. Fallon stressed this would cause a terrible <br />impact on the tax roll of beachfront property which in turn would <br />translate into reduction of public safety services, and most <br />importantly, reduction of school funding. <br />Chairman Eggert understood that some areas west of the river <br />also would, be in the new zone categories, which Dr. Fallon <br />confirmed. <br />Commissioner Scurlock reported that his brief research into <br />this issue shows that originally the national flood insurance <br />program was focussed on the river basins rather than coastal <br />communities, which Dr. Fallon confirmed. <br />Chairman Eggert agreed, and added that the details of the bill <br />cause concern because it affects not only coastline structures but <br />also the west portion of the county. It is unclear as to what the <br />results may be and what will happen with the changed zone <br />categories in the future. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt the bottom line of the legislation <br />is to say, "Don't build down near the water, period," but it is <br />much more complex because when rivers rise and people get flooded, <br />we all are paying for it, and the results become complex. <br />Dr. Fallon advised that this very bill excludes the <br />Mississippi River Basin area, which comprises 43 percent of all the <br />claims. The bill is really meant for areas like North Carolina <br />that have no coastal management zones in force. <br />Discussion ensued about the status of the legislation and Dr. <br />Fallon explained that the bill is out of the committee and is <br />moving forward as an amendment to Senator Alan Cranston's National <br />Housing Bill. It has passed through the House of Representatives <br />and will be introduced in the Senate on the 21st. Dr. Fallon <br />pointed out that some politicians voted for the bill without <br />reading it and mentioned Representative Jim Bacchus as one such <br />individual. <br />11 <br />BOOK <br />