My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/2/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
6/2/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:59:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/02/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
are more costly and cumbersome and the applicant needs to know he <br />can get local approval before spending a lot of time and effort. <br />The Chairman recessed the meeting briefly at 10:05 A. M. and <br />the Board reconvened at 10:15 A. M. with all members present. <br />Attorney Ralph Evans, representing Michael and Shirley <br />O'Haire, came before the Board to address some of the conclusions <br />reached by staff in making their determination that this permit <br />should be issued. <br />Mr. Evans recounted the history of this matter and reminded <br />the Board that the minutes of a BCC meeting in August of 1991 <br />reflected representations from staff that the lagoon would not be <br />filled. In essence, this is not a permit to fill the lagoon but <br />only a permit to fill a portion of it. However, if the <br />representation of not filling the lagoon had some impact on the <br />Board's decision against the rezoning, that should be addressed. <br />Attorney Evans contended that the subject permit is designed <br />to create two additional lots in a proposed subdivision which is <br />not allowed. He pointed out that there was conversation about the <br />state of degradation in the lagoon and of serving the public <br />interest, and he felt there has been an effort to characterize this <br />as a public interest when in fact it is nothing more than a private <br />interest. Attorney Evans referred to a letter staff wrote to the <br />applicant suggesting that he consider planned development. The <br />applicant's response, in a letter from their representative, <br />Peterson and Votapka, dated December 11, 1991, was, in part, <br />"because of the following reasons it was determined that the <br />planned development concept would not only minimize the amount of <br />filling of the lagoon that we deem necessary for reasonable <br />development of the lot, it would also mandate unnecessary <br />requirements that would be adverse and in excess of the design <br />concept of the project." Attorney Evans called that private <br />interest. <br />Attorney Evans noted that the applicant stated he would not be <br />removing fill but removing silt, and would bring fill from some <br />other location for the lots. He read from the application received <br />by the Central Florida District to the DER, date-stamped March, <br />1991, "Item Ten, Description of Work: Dredge 952 cubic yards of <br />clean material from a man-made lagoon to fill an area of 18,560 <br />square feet; with the fill provide buildable single family lots for <br />the proposed subdivision." <br />He directed the Board's attention to a letter from USFWS which <br />recommended denial of the application based on a small but <br />17 <br />JUN � ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.