My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/21/2003 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
10/21/2003 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2016 12:02:15 AM
Creation date
6/13/2016 11:11:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/21/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ii <br /> Avenue all the way to 80' Street at his expense. <br /> i <br /> Director Keating specified that the developer would be required to pave the necessary <br /> roads to gain access. The developer may be able to get traffic impact credits. There are <br /> several properties in the vicinity that have been submitted for rezoning so there could be <br /> several developments that would have <br /> p to comply with our roadway grid system. <br /> Commissioner Neuberger asked if a median cut would be required on SR 60 by <br /> h <br /> FDOT,and Director Keating advised that there will be a full median opening at 981"Avenue <br /> to allow turning and there will be a signal. <br /> The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br /> this matter. <br /> Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Blvd., representing the applicant, thought it was <br /> important for the Commissioners to understand that the traffic impact study was analyzed <br /> and has been approved. <br /> Vice Chairman Ginn reiterated her concern about traffic spilling onto SR 60 <br /> eastbound. <br /> Mr. Barkett pointed out that no development can occur there until 98" Avenue is <br /> paved. He assumed the developers will work together to get the roads paved,possibly with <br /> the County if they are on the Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Barkett explained that the developer <br /> could use that area for stormwater management or open space,but not for homes unless they <br /> were under the Ag zoning(one unit per 5 acres). <br /> John Williams, Smugglers Cove, strongly objected to this incredibly premature <br /> rezoning for residential development in the "boondocks". He was tired of having our tax <br /> money go to pay for development to subsidize our own demise. He believed the County <br /> October 21, 2003 <br /> 16 <br /> Bt( 12 055 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.